Hi Boris,
On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 10:42:07AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 11:12:55 +0200 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 10:03:02AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 20:17:05 +0200 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 03, 2019
On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 11:12:55 +0200
Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 10:03:02AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 20:17:05 +0200 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 03:15:12PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > > One of the l
Hi Boris,
On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 10:03:02AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 20:17:05 +0200 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 03:15:12PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > One of the last remaining objects to not have its atomic state.
> > >
> > > This is bei
On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 20:17:05 +0200
Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 03:15:12PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > One of the last remaining objects to not have its atomic state.
> >
> > This is being motivated by our attempt to support
Hi Boris,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 03:15:12PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> One of the last remaining objects to not have its atomic state.
>
> This is being motivated by our attempt to support runtime bus-format
> negotiation between elements of the bridge chain.
> Thi
One of the last remaining objects to not have its atomic state.
This is being motivated by our attempt to support runtime bus-format
negotiation between elements of the bridge chain.
This patch just paves the road for such a feature by adding a new
drm_bridge_state object inheriting from drm_priva
