On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 11:39:29AM +, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> Works as expected, Thanks!
> I would report if there is anything else interesting.
Thanks a lot! What you have done is helpful.
Thanks,
Byungchul
> Tested-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hye...@gmail.com>
>
> --
> Thank you, You are awesom
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 04:06:41PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> Dept already prevents creating dependencies between different depths of
> the class indicated by *_lock_nested() when the lock acquisitions happen
> consecutively.
>
>lock A0 with depth
>lock_nested A1 with depth + 1
>..
Dept already prevents creating dependencies between different depths of
the class indicated by *_lock_nested() when the lock acquisitions happen
consecutively.
lock A0 with depth
lock_nested A1 with depth + 1
...
unlock A1
unlock A0
Dept does not create A0 -> A1 dependency in this
