Re: [PATCH v4 24/24] drm/exynos: dsi: Adjust probe order

2021-09-23 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hi Maxime, On 22.09.2021 10:53, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 02:35:05PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote: >> On 13.09.2021 12:30, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >>> W dniu 10.09.2021 o 12:12, Maxime Ripard pisze: Without proper care and an agreement between how DSI hosts and devices

Re: [PATCH v4 24/24] drm/exynos: dsi: Adjust probe order

2021-09-22 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi Marek, On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 02:35:05PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > Hi, > > On 13.09.2021 12:30, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > > W dniu 10.09.2021 o 12:12, Maxime Ripard pisze: > >> Without proper care and an agreement between how DSI hosts and devices > >> drivers register their MIPI-DSI

Re: [PATCH v4 24/24] drm/exynos: dsi: Adjust probe order

2021-09-17 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hi, On 13.09.2021 12:30, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > W dniu 10.09.2021 o 12:12, Maxime Ripard pisze: >> Without proper care and an agreement between how DSI hosts and devices >> drivers register their MIPI-DSI entities and potential components, we can >> end up in a situation where the drivers can

Re: [PATCH v4 24/24] drm/exynos: dsi: Adjust probe order

2021-09-13 Thread Andrzej Hajda
W dniu 10.09.2021 o 12:12, Maxime Ripard pisze: > Without proper care and an agreement between how DSI hosts and devices > drivers register their MIPI-DSI entities and potential components, we can > end up in a situation where the drivers can never probe. > > Most drivers were taking evasive

[PATCH v4 24/24] drm/exynos: dsi: Adjust probe order

2021-09-10 Thread Maxime Ripard
Without proper care and an agreement between how DSI hosts and devices drivers register their MIPI-DSI entities and potential components, we can end up in a situation where the drivers can never probe. Most drivers were taking evasive maneuvers to try to workaround this, but not all of them were