On 06/07/2022 00:52, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley
>
> The k210 U-Boot port has been using the clocks defined in the
> devicetree to bring up the board's SRAM, but this violates the
> dt-schema. As such, move the clocks to a dedicated node with
> the same compatible string & document
On 12/07/2022 17:54, conor.doo...@microchip.com wrote:
> On 11/07/2022 00:21, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> On 7/11/22 04:39, conor.doo...@microchip.com wrote:
>>> Damien, Krzysztof,
>>>
>>> I know this particular version has not been posted for all that
>>> long, but this binding is (functionally)
On 7/11/22 04:39, conor.doo...@microchip.com wrote:
> Damien, Krzysztof,
>
> I know this particular version has not been posted for all that
> long, but this binding is (functionally) unchanged for a few
> versions now. Are you happy with this approach Damien?
> U-Boot only cares about the
On Tue, 05 Jul 2022 22:52:05 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley
>
> The k210 U-Boot port has been using the clocks defined in the
> devicetree to bring up the board's SRAM, but this violates the
> dt-schema. As such, move the clocks to a dedicated node with
> the same compatible
