> > Why? ePAPR says "okay", "disabled", "fail", or "fail-sss".
> >
> > Sorry for missing this in the previous round.
>
> That was per Wolfram's request, and because the existing code uses "ok". I'm
> personally fine with any.
I did? Well, today I don't have a strong preference. Any is fine wit
Hi Geert,
On Thursday, 22 February 2018 11:26:44 EET Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 1:05 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > From: Pantelis Antoniou
> >
> > The changeset helpers are easier to use, use them instead of
> > using the static property.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pantel
Hi Laurent,
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 1:05 AM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> From: Pantelis Antoniou
>
> The changeset helpers are easier to use, use them instead of
> using the static property.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou
> Acked-by: Wolfram Sang
> ["okay" -> "ok"]
Why? ePAPR says "okay",
From: Pantelis Antoniou
The changeset helpers are easier to use, use them instead of
using the static property.
Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang
["okay" -> "ok"]
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
---
drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-demux-pinctrl.c | 12 +++-
1 file changed