Hi Matt,
> > + /*
> > +* Do not create the command streamer for CCS slices beyond the first.
> > +* All the workload submitted to the first engine will be shared among
> > +* all the slices.
> > +*
> > +* Once the user will be allowed to customize the CCS mode, then this
> >
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 04:56:18PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> We want a fixed load CCS balancing consisting in all slices
> sharing one single user engine. For this reason do not create the
> intel_engine_cs structure with its dedicated command streamer for
> CCS slices beyond the first.
>
>
We want a fixed load CCS balancing consisting in all slices
sharing one single user engine. For this reason do not create the
intel_engine_cs structure with its dedicated command streamer for
CCS slices beyond the first.
Fixes: d2eae8e98d59 ("drm/i915/dg2: Drop force_probe requirement")
