Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v8 10/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Introduce GMU wrapper support

2023-06-19 Thread Konrad Dybcio
On 17.06.2023 18:07, Akhil P Oommen wrote: > On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 02:00:50AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> >> On 16.06.2023 19:54, Akhil P Oommen wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 11:43:04PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: On 10.06.2023 00:06, Akhil P Oommen wrote: > On Mon, May 29,

Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v8 10/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Introduce GMU wrapper support

2023-06-17 Thread Akhil P Oommen
On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 02:00:50AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > > On 16.06.2023 19:54, Akhil P Oommen wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 11:43:04PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > >> > >> On 10.06.2023 00:06, Akhil P Oommen wrote: > >>> On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 03:52:29PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio

Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v8 10/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Introduce GMU wrapper support

2023-06-16 Thread Konrad Dybcio
On 16.06.2023 19:54, Akhil P Oommen wrote: > On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 11:43:04PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> >> On 10.06.2023 00:06, Akhil P Oommen wrote: >>> On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 03:52:29PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: Some (particularly SMD_RPM, a.k.a non-RPMh) SoCs implement A6XX

Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v8 10/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Introduce GMU wrapper support

2023-06-16 Thread Akhil P Oommen
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 11:43:04PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > > On 10.06.2023 00:06, Akhil P Oommen wrote: > > On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 03:52:29PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > >> > >> Some (particularly SMD_RPM, a.k.a non-RPMh) SoCs implement A6XX GPUs > >> but don't implement the associated

Re: [PATCH v8 10/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Introduce GMU wrapper support

2023-06-15 Thread Konrad Dybcio
On 10.06.2023 00:06, Akhil P Oommen wrote: > On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 03:52:29PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> >> Some (particularly SMD_RPM, a.k.a non-RPMh) SoCs implement A6XX GPUs >> but don't implement the associated GMUs. This is due to the fact that >> the GMU directly pokes at RPMh. Sadly,

Re: [PATCH v8 10/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Introduce GMU wrapper support

2023-06-09 Thread Akhil P Oommen
On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 03:52:29PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > > Some (particularly SMD_RPM, a.k.a non-RPMh) SoCs implement A6XX GPUs > but don't implement the associated GMUs. This is due to the fact that > the GMU directly pokes at RPMh. Sadly, this means we have to take care > of enabling &

[PATCH v8 10/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Introduce GMU wrapper support

2023-05-29 Thread Konrad Dybcio
Some (particularly SMD_RPM, a.k.a non-RPMh) SoCs implement A6XX GPUs but don't implement the associated GMUs. This is due to the fact that the GMU directly pokes at RPMh. Sadly, this means we have to take care of enabling & scaling power rails, clocks and bandwidth ourselves. Reuse existing