On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 18:26:52 +0100
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 12:00:32PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > One of the last remaining objects to not have its atomic state.
> >
> > This is being motivated by our attempt to support runtime bus-format
> > negotiation between elem
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 12:00:32PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> One of the last remaining objects to not have its atomic state.
>
> This is being motivated by our attempt to support runtime bus-format
> negotiation between elements of the bridge chain.
> This patch just paves the road for such
One of the last remaining objects to not have its atomic state.
This is being motivated by our attempt to support runtime bus-format
negotiation between elements of the bridge chain.
This patch just paves the road for such a feature by adding a new
drm_bridge_state object inheriting from drm_priva
