[dropped linux-next from Cc]
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 03:10:56PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> >> But why is it it we need omapfb at all when we have omapdrm?
> >
> > I think there are two reasons omapfb has not been killed yet. One
> > reason was missing support for manually updated DSI pan
[replace Tomi's TI mail address with something working]
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 08:58:39PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 12:24:41PM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > Standard DRM panel driver for DSI command mode panel used by omapfb2 is also
> > av
Hi Sebastian,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 05:24:54PM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> [dropped linux-next from Cc]
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 03:10:56PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > >> But why is it it we need omapfb at all when we have omapdrm?
> > >
> > > I think there are two reaso
Hi,
On 12/01/2021 14:02, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> [replace Tomi's TI mail address with something working]
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 08:58:39PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> Hi Sebastian,
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 12:24:41PM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
>>> Standard DRM panel d
Standard DRM panel driver for DSI command mode panel used by omapfb2 is also
available now. Just like the other panels its module name clashes with the
module from drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays, part of the deprecated
omapfb2 fbdev driver. As omapfb2 can only be compiled when the omapdr
Hi Sebatian,
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 12:24:41PM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Standard DRM panel driver for DSI command mode panel used by omapfb2 is also
> available now. Just like the other panels its module name clashes with the
> module from drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays, part