[PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-05-13 Thread Rahul Sharma
On 7 May 2014 21:03, Tomasz Figa wrote: > [CCing more DT-folks :)] > > On 07.05.2014 16:19, Rahul Sharma wrote: >> On 7 May 2014 19:06, Tomasz Stanislawski wrote: >>> On 05/07/2014 12:38 PM, Rahul Sharma wrote: On 5 May 2014 15:14, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > Hi, > > On We

[PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-05-07 Thread Rahul Sharma
On 7 May 2014 19:06, Tomasz Stanislawski wrote: > On 05/07/2014 12:38 PM, Rahul Sharma wrote: >> On 5 May 2014 15:14, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Wednesday 09 April 2014 03:31 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: Hi, On 09/04/14 11:12, Rahul Sharma wrote: > Idea l

[PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-05-07 Thread Tomasz Figa
[CCing more DT-folks :)] On 07.05.2014 16:19, Rahul Sharma wrote: > On 7 May 2014 19:06, Tomasz Stanislawski wrote: >> On 05/07/2014 12:38 PM, Rahul Sharma wrote: >>> On 5 May 2014 15:14, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: Hi, On Wednesday 09 April 2014 03:31 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wro

[PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-05-07 Thread Rahul Sharma
On 5 May 2014 15:14, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > Hi, > > On Wednesday 09 April 2014 03:31 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 09/04/14 11:12, Rahul Sharma wrote: >>> Idea looks good. How about keeping compatible which is independent >>> of SoC, something like "samsung,exynos-simple-p

[PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-05-07 Thread Tomasz Stanislawski
On 05/07/2014 12:38 PM, Rahul Sharma wrote: > On 5 May 2014 15:14, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wednesday 09 April 2014 03:31 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 09/04/14 11:12, Rahul Sharma wrote: Idea looks good. How about keeping compatible which is independen

[PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-05-05 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
Hi, On Wednesday 09 April 2014 03:31 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > Hi, > > On 09/04/14 11:12, Rahul Sharma wrote: >> Idea looks good. How about keeping compatible which is independent >> of SoC, something like "samsung,exynos-simple-phy" and provide Reg >> and Bit through phy provider node. Thi

[PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-04-30 Thread Rahul Sharma
Sure (5250, 5420). I will wait for the same to update DT patches, if any. Regards, Rahul Sharma. On 30 April 2014 14:02, Tomasz Stanislawski wrote: > Hi Rahul, > I will prepare we v3 version. > Do you want me to add your patches for exynos5?50 to the patchset? > Regards, > Tomasz Stanislawski >

[PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-04-30 Thread Rahul Sharma
Hi Tomasz, I have tested your patches for exynos5250 and 5420. Works fine. Are you planning to post v3? If you want I can share hand with you for v3. Regards, Rahul Sharma On 9 April 2014 17:17, Andreas Oberritter wrote: > Hello Andrzej, > > On 09.04.2014 10:37, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >>> +static

[PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-04-30 Thread Tomasz Stanislawski
Hi Rahul, I will prepare we v3 version. Do you want me to add your patches for exynos5?50 to the patchset? Regards, Tomasz Stanislawski On 04/30/2014 08:37 AM, Rahul Sharma wrote: > Hi Tomasz, > > I have tested your patches for exynos5250 and 5420. Works fine. Are > you planning to post v3? If yo

[PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-04-09 Thread Rahul Sharma
Hi Tomasz, On 9 April 2014 14:07, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > Hi Tomasz, > > On 04/08/2014 04:37 PM, Tomasz Stanislawski wrote: >> Add exynos-simple-phy driver to support a single register >> PHY interfaces present on Exynos4 SoC. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Stanislawski >> --- >> .../devicetree/bin

[PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-04-09 Thread Andreas Oberritter
Hello Andrzej, On 09.04.2014 10:37, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >> +static int exynos_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> +{ >> +const struct of_device_id *of_id = of_match_device( >> +of_match_ptr(exynos_phy_of_match), &pdev->dev); >> +const u32 *offsets = of_id->data; >> +

[PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-04-09 Thread Tomasz Stanislawski
Hi Rahul, On 04/09/2014 11:12 AM, Rahul Sharma wrote: > Hi Tomasz, > > On 9 April 2014 14:07, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >> Hi Tomasz, >> >> On 04/08/2014 04:37 PM, Tomasz Stanislawski wrote: >>> Add exynos-simple-phy driver to support a single register >>> PHY interfaces present on Exynos4 SoC. >>> >

[PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-04-09 Thread Sylwester Nawrocki
Hi, On 09/04/14 11:12, Rahul Sharma wrote: > Idea looks good. How about keeping compatible which is independent > of SoC, something like "samsung,exynos-simple-phy" and provide Reg > and Bit through phy provider node. This way we can avoid SoC specific > hardcoding in phy driver and don't need to

[PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-04-09 Thread Andrzej Hajda
Hi Tomasz, On 04/08/2014 04:37 PM, Tomasz Stanislawski wrote: > Add exynos-simple-phy driver to support a single register > PHY interfaces present on Exynos4 SoC. > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Stanislawski > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung-phy.txt| 24 +++ > drivers/phy/Kconfig

[PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-04-08 Thread Tomasz Stanislawski
Add exynos-simple-phy driver to support a single register PHY interfaces present on Exynos4 SoC. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Stanislawski --- .../devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung-phy.txt| 24 +++ drivers/phy/Kconfig|5 + drivers/phy/Makefile