[RFC][PATCH 0/10] Atomic modesetting v2

2012-06-27 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 09:48:26AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:24:02 +0300 > ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote: > > > Second version of the atomic mode setting work. Still very much > > work in progress. > > > > I decided that I can't afford to fight the drm_crtc_help

[RFC][PATCH 0/10] Atomic modesetting v2

2012-06-27 Thread Dave Airlie
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 09:48 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > >> The other thing I'm worried about with atomic mode setting is handling >> the legacy case properly. ?We'll still need to handle apps that want to >> change one CRTC at a time without

[RFC][PATCH 0/10] Atomic modesetting v2

2012-06-27 Thread ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
Second version of the atomic mode setting work. Still very much work in progress. I decided that I can't afford to fight the drm_crtc_helper architecture due to the sheer amount of driver code depending on it. So I changed the code to do things in way that more closely matches drm_crtc_helper. Ne

[RFC][PATCH 0/10] Atomic modesetting v2

2012-06-27 Thread Adam Jackson
On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 09:48 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > The other thing I'm worried about with atomic mode setting is handling > the legacy case properly. We'll still need to handle apps that want to > change one CRTC at a time without altering the state of other CRTCs. Fortunately that's not t

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/10] Atomic modesetting v2

2012-06-27 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 09:48:26AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:24:02 +0300 > ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > > Second version of the atomic mode setting work. Still very much > > work in progress. > > > > I decided that I can't afford to fight the drm_crtc_helper

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/10] Atomic modesetting v2

2012-06-27 Thread Dave Airlie
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 09:48 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > >> The other thing I'm worried about with atomic mode setting is handling >> the legacy case properly.  We'll still need to handle apps that want to >> change one CRTC at a time without

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/10] Atomic modesetting v2

2012-06-27 Thread Adam Jackson
On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 09:48 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > The other thing I'm worried about with atomic mode setting is handling > the legacy case properly. We'll still need to handle apps that want to > change one CRTC at a time without altering the state of other CRTCs. Fortunately that's not t

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/10] Atomic modesetting v2

2012-06-27 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:24:02 +0300 ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > Second version of the atomic mode setting work. Still very much > work in progress. > > I decided that I can't afford to fight the drm_crtc_helper > architecture due to the sheer amount of driver code depending on it. > So

[RFC][PATCH 0/10] Atomic modesetting v2

2012-06-27 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:24:02 +0300 ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote: > Second version of the atomic mode setting work. Still very much > work in progress. > > I decided that I can't afford to fight the drm_crtc_helper > architecture due to the sheer amount of driver code depending on it. >

[RFC][PATCH 0/10] Atomic modesetting v2

2012-06-27 Thread ville . syrjala
Second version of the atomic mode setting work. Still very much work in progress. I decided that I can't afford to fight the drm_crtc_helper architecture due to the sheer amount of driver code depending on it. So I changed the code to do things in way that more closely matches drm_crtc_helper. Ne