Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] drm: Support simple-framebuffer devices and firmware fbs

Hi, On 7/3/20 2:58 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 12:55 PM Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 7/1/20 4:10 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: Hi Daniel, thanks for reviewing most of the patchset. Am 30.06.20 um 11:06 schrieb Daniel Vetter: On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:39 AM Hans de

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] drm: Support simple-framebuffer devices and firmware fbs

On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 12:55 PM Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi, > > On 7/1/20 4:10 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > thanks for reviewing most of the patchset. > > > > Am 30.06.20 um 11:06 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:39 AM Hans de Goede wrote: > >>> >

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] drm: Support simple-framebuffer devices and firmware fbs

Hi Am 03.07.20 um 12:55 schrieb Hans de Goede: > Hi, > > On 7/1/20 4:10 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> thanks for reviewing most of the patchset. >> >> Am 30.06.20 um 11:06 schrieb Daniel Vetter: >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:39 AM Hans de Goede >>> wrote: Hi,

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] drm: Support simple-framebuffer devices and firmware fbs

Hi, On 7/1/20 4:10 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: Hi Daniel, thanks for reviewing most of the patchset. Am 30.06.20 um 11:06 schrieb Daniel Vetter: On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:39 AM Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 6/25/20 2:00 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: This patchset adds support for

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] drm: Support simple-framebuffer devices and firmware fbs

Hi, On 7/1/20 3:48 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: Hi Hans Am 29.06.20 um 11:38 schrieb Hans de Goede: Hi, On 6/25/20 2:00 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: This patchset adds support for simple-framebuffer platform devices and a handover mechanism for native drivers to take-over control of the

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] drm: Support simple-framebuffer devices and firmware fbs

Hi Daniel, thanks for reviewing most of the patchset. Am 30.06.20 um 11:06 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:39 AM Hans de Goede wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 6/25/20 2:00 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >>> This patchset adds support for simple-framebuffer platform devices and >>> a

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] drm: Support simple-framebuffer devices and firmware fbs

Hi Hans Am 29.06.20 um 11:38 schrieb Hans de Goede: > Hi, > > On 6/25/20 2:00 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >> This patchset adds support for simple-framebuffer platform devices and >> a handover mechanism for native drivers to take-over control of the >> hardware. >> >> The new driver, called

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] drm: Support simple-framebuffer devices and firmware fbs

Hi, On 6/30/20 11:06 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:39 AM Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 6/25/20 2:00 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: This patchset adds support for simple-framebuffer platform devices and a handover mechanism for native drivers to take-over control of the

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] drm: Support simple-framebuffer devices and firmware fbs

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:39 AM Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi, > > On 6/25/20 2:00 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > This patchset adds support for simple-framebuffer platform devices and > > a handover mechanism for native drivers to take-over control of the > > hardware. > > > > The new driver,

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] drm: Support simple-framebuffer devices and firmware fbs

Hi, On 6/25/20 2:00 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: This patchset adds support for simple-framebuffer platform devices and a handover mechanism for native drivers to take-over control of the hardware. The new driver, called simplekms, binds to a simple-frambuffer platform device. The kernel's

[RFC][PATCH 0/9] drm: Support simple-framebuffer devices and firmware fbs

This patchset adds support for simple-framebuffer platform devices and a handover mechanism for native drivers to take-over control of the hardware. The new driver, called simplekms, binds to a simple-frambuffer platform device. The kernel's boot code creates such devices for firmware-provided