On 07/03/2024 14:22, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
> [...]
>
> For drm_panic, I changed the way the debugfs is calling the drm_panic
> functions in the last version:
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/581845/?series=122244=9
>
> It doesn't use the panic notifier list, but create a file for each
On 05/03/2024 18:50, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
On 05/03/2024 13:52, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
[...]
Or maybe have two lists of panic notifiers, the safe and the destructive
list. So in case of fake panic, we can only call the safe notifiers.
I tried something like that:
On 05/03/2024 13:52, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
> [...]
> Or maybe have two lists of panic notifiers, the safe and the destructive
> list. So in case of fake panic, we can only call the safe notifiers.
>
I tried something like that:
On 05/03/2024 17:23, Michael Kelley wrote:
From: Guilherme G. Piccoli Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024
1:43 PM
On 04/03/2024 18:12, John Ogness wrote:
[...]
The second question is how to simulate a panic context in a
non-destructive way, so we can test the panic notifiers in CI, without
On 04/03/2024 22:12, John Ogness wrote:
[Added printk maintainer and kdb folks]
Hi Jocelyn,
On 2024-03-01, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
While writing a panic handler for drm devices [1], I needed a way to
test it without crashing the machine.
So from debugfs, I called
From: Guilherme G. Piccoli Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024
1:43 PM
>
> On 04/03/2024 18:12, John Ogness wrote:
> > [...]
> >> The second question is how to simulate a panic context in a
> >> non-destructive way, so we can test the panic notifiers in CI, without
> >> crashing the machine.
> >
> >
On 04/03/2024 18:12, John Ogness wrote:
> [...]
>> The second question is how to simulate a panic context in a
>> non-destructive way, so we can test the panic notifiers in CI, without
>> crashing the machine.
>
> I'm wondering if a "fake panic" can be implemented that quiesces all the
> other
[Added printk maintainer and kdb folks]
Hi Jocelyn,
On 2024-03-01, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
> While writing a panic handler for drm devices [1], I needed a way to
> test it without crashing the machine.
> So from debugfs, I called
> atomic_notifier_call_chain(_notifier_list, ...), but it has
Hi,
While writing a panic handler for drm devices [1], I needed a way to
test it without crashing the machine.
So from debugfs, I called
atomic_notifier_call_chain(_notifier_list, ...), but it has the
side effect of calling all other panic notifiers registered.
So Sima suggested to move
