On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 6:10 PM Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 10:41 AM Oded Gabbay wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 4:55 PM Alex Deucher wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 5:46 PM Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In the last couple of months we had a
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 10:34 AM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 10:21:34AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> > E.g., the kfd node provides platform level compute
> > topology information; e.g., the NUMA details for connected GPUs and
> > CPUs, non-GPU compute node information,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 10:21:34AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> E.g., the kfd node provides platform level compute
> topology information; e.g., the NUMA details for connected GPUs and
> CPUs, non-GPU compute node information, cache level topologies, etc.
See, this is exactly what I'm talking
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 7:15 AM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 12:27:11PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> > The userspace for those is normally bespoke like ROCm, which uses
> > amdkfd, and amdkfd doesn't operate like most device files from what I
> > know, so I'm not sure we'd
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 12:27:11PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> The userspace for those is normally bespoke like ROCm, which uses
> amdkfd, and amdkfd doesn't operate like most device files from what I
> know, so I'm not sure we'd want it to operate as an accel device.
I intensely dislike this
On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 12:21, John Hubbard wrote:
>
> On 10/24/22 05:43, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>
> Hi Oded,
>
> The patches make sense to me. I'm still just reading through and looking
> for minor issues, but at a high level it seems to match what the LPC
> discussions pointed to.
>
> >> What's your
On 10/24/22 05:43, Oded Gabbay wrote:
Hi Oded,
The patches make sense to me. I'm still just reading through and looking
for minor issues, but at a high level it seems to match what the LPC
discussions pointed to.
What's your opinion on the long-term prospect of DRM vs accel? I assume
that
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 10:41 AM Oded Gabbay wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 4:55 PM Alex Deucher wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 5:46 PM Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > >
> > > In the last couple of months we had a discussion [1] about creating a new
> > > subsystem for compute accelerator
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 4:55 PM Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 5:46 PM Oded Gabbay wrote:
> >
> > In the last couple of months we had a discussion [1] about creating a new
> > subsystem for compute accelerator devices in the kernel.
> >
> > After an analysis that was done by DRM
On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 5:46 PM Oded Gabbay wrote:
>
> In the last couple of months we had a discussion [1] about creating a new
> subsystem for compute accelerator devices in the kernel.
>
> After an analysis that was done by DRM maintainers and myself, and following
> a BOF session at the Linux
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 01:55:56PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 22.10.22 um 23:46 schrieb Oded Gabbay:
> > In the last couple of months we had a discussion [1] about creating a new
> > subsystem for compute accelerator devices in the kernel.
> >
> > After an analysis that was done
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 2:56 PM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Am 22.10.22 um 23:46 schrieb Oded Gabbay:
> > In the last couple of months we had a discussion [1] about creating a new
> > subsystem for compute accelerator devices in the kernel.
> >
> > After an analysis that was done by DRM
Hi
Am 22.10.22 um 23:46 schrieb Oded Gabbay:
In the last couple of months we had a discussion [1] about creating a new
subsystem for compute accelerator devices in the kernel.
After an analysis that was done by DRM maintainers and myself, and following
a BOF session at the Linux Plumbers
On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 09:02:49PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 12:46:19AM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > In the last couple of months we had a discussion [1] about creating a new
> > subsystem for compute accelerator devices in the kernel.
> >
> > After an analysis that
On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 12:46:19AM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> In the last couple of months we had a discussion [1] about creating a new
> subsystem for compute accelerator devices in the kernel.
>
> After an analysis that was done by DRM maintainers and myself, and following
> a BOF session at
In the last couple of months we had a discussion [1] about creating a new
subsystem for compute accelerator devices in the kernel.
After an analysis that was done by DRM maintainers and myself, and following
a BOF session at the Linux Plumbers conference a few weeks ago [2], we
decided to create
16 matches
Mail list logo
