> Why is this loop soo complicated? Why do you need to mess around with
> this "last_ep" stuff - you don't actually end up using it.
>
> The loop reduces down to this without comments:
>
> for (i = 0; !ret; i++) {
Philipp, "ret" isn't set anymore in the new loop.
Hi Dan,
Am Dienstag, den 11.02.2014, 11:38 +0300 schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> > Why is this loop soo complicated? Why do you need to mess around with
> > this "last_ep" stuff - you don't actually end up using it.
> >
> > The loop reduces down to this without comments:
> >
> > for (i = 0; !ret;
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 04:26:31PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
[...]
> Why is this loop soo complicated? Why do you need to mess around with
> this "last_ep" stuff - you don't actually end up using it.
The last_ep dance is necessary because v4l2_of_get_next_endpoint(node,prev)
does
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 03:52:01PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> @@ -438,24 +453,21 @@ int imx_drm_encoder_parse_of(struct drm_device *drm,
> struct drm_encoder *encoder, struct device_node *np)
> {
> struct imx_drm_device *imxdrm = drm->dev_private;
> + struct device_node *ep,
Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel
---
drivers/staging/imx-drm/imx-drm-core.c | 44 --
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/imx-drm/imx-drm-core.c
b/drivers/staging/imx-drm/imx-drm-core.c
index 2490dc3..2c20434 100644
---
