Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/6] i2c: add docs to clarify DMA handling

2017-09-20 Thread Wolfram Sang
> In order to avoid that, and to place them into a box using monotonic fonts, > I usually add "::" at the preceding line, e. g.: Just in time: I added the '::' and will resubmit the new version in a minute. Thanks for the pointers! signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/6] i2c: add docs to clarify DMA handling

2017-09-20 Thread Wolfram Sang
Hi Mauro, > > +Linux I2C and DMA > > +- > > I would use, instead: > > = > Linux I2C and DMA > = > > As this is the way we're starting document titles, after converted to > ReST. So, better to have it already using the right format, as one day I

Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/6] i2c: add docs to clarify DMA handling

2017-09-09 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Sat, 9 Sep 2017 17:27:06 +0200 Wolfram Sang escreveu: > > Yes, but the statistics that 10% of I2C bus master drivers > > are DMA-safe is not true, if you take those into account ;-) > > > > Perhaps you could write it as (or something similar): > > > > At this time of

Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/6] i2c: add docs to clarify DMA handling

2017-09-09 Thread Wolfram Sang
> Yes, but the statistics that 10% of I2C bus master drivers > are DMA-safe is not true, if you take those into account ;-) > > Perhaps you could write it as (or something similar): > > At this time of writing, only +10% of I2C bus master > drivers for non-remote boards have DMA

Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/6] i2c: add docs to clarify DMA handling

2017-09-09 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Fri, 8 Sep 2017 10:56:40 +0200 Wolfram Sang escreveu: > Hi Mauro, > > thanks for your comments. Much appreciated! > > > There are also a couple of things here that Sphinx would complain. > > So, it could be worth to rename it to *.rst, while you're writing > > it, and

Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/6] i2c: add docs to clarify DMA handling

2017-09-08 Thread Wolfram Sang
Hi Mauro, thanks for your comments. Much appreciated! > There are also a couple of things here that Sphinx would complain. > So, it could be worth to rename it to *.rst, while you're writing > it, and see what: > make htmldocs > will complain and how it will look in html. OK, I'll check

Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/6] i2c: add docs to clarify DMA handling

2017-08-27 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Thu, 17 Aug 2017 16:14:46 +0200 Wolfram Sang escreveu: > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > --- > Documentation/i2c/DMA-considerations | 50 > > 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+) > create

[RFC PATCH v4 3/6] i2c: add docs to clarify DMA handling

2017-08-17 Thread Wolfram Sang
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang --- Documentation/i2c/DMA-considerations | 50 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/i2c/DMA-considerations diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/DMA-considerations