On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:01:14AM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 02/13/2017 10:18 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > The software defined networking people seemed to think they had a use
> > case for this as well. They're not entirely upstream of course but
> > still...
> This is the first I've heard
On 02/13/2017 10:18 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 03:45:04PM +0100, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>
>> An other question is: do we have others memory regions that could be
>> interested
>> by this new framework ? I have in mind that some title memory regions could
>> use
>> it or
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 03:45:04PM +0100, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> An other question is: do we have others memory regions that could be
> interested
> by this new framework ? I have in mind that some title memory regions could
> use
> it or replace ION heaps (system, carveout, etc...).
>
version 2:
- rebase code on 4.10-rc7
- fix bug in CMA allocator
- do more tests with wayland dmabuf protocol:
https://git.linaro.org/people/benjamin.gaignard/simple_allocator.git
The goal of this RFC is to understand if a common ioctl for specific memory
regions allocations is needed/welcome.
