Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-02-09 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 2013-02-04 12:05, Marcus Lorentzon wrote: > As discussed at FOSDEM I will give DSI bus with full feature set a > try. Please do, but as a reminder I want to raise the issues I see with a DSI bus: - A device can be a child of only one bus. So if DSI is used only for video, the device is a chil

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-02-08 Thread Marcus Lorentzon
On 02/08/2013 11:51 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 2013-02-04 12:05, Marcus Lorentzon wrote: > >> As discussed at FOSDEM I will give DSI bus with full feature set a >> try. > Please do, but as a reminder I want to raise the issues I see with a DSI > bus: > > - A device can be a child of only one bu

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-02-08 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 2013-02-04 12:05, Marcus Lorentzon wrote: > As discussed at FOSDEM I will give DSI bus with full feature set a > try. Please do, but as a reminder I want to raise the issues I see with a DSI bus: - A device can be a child of only one bus. So if DSI is used only for video, the device is a chil

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-02-08 Thread Marcus Lorentzon
On 02/08/2013 11:51 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: On 2013-02-04 12:05, Marcus Lorentzon wrote: As discussed at FOSDEM I will give DSI bus with full feature set a try. Please do, but as a reminder I want to raise the issues I see with a DSI bus: - A device can be a child of only one bus. So if DSI

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-02-06 Thread Archit Taneja
On Monday 04 February 2013 03:35 PM, Marcus Lorentzon wrote: > On 02/02/2013 12:35 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> Hi Marcus, >> >> On Tuesday 08 January 2013 18:08:19 Marcus Lorentzon wrote: >>> On 01/08/2013 05:36 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: On Tuesday 08 of January 2013 11:12:26 Marcus Lorentzon

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-02-06 Thread Archit Taneja
On Monday 04 February 2013 03:35 PM, Marcus Lorentzon wrote: On 02/02/2013 12:35 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: Hi Marcus, On Tuesday 08 January 2013 18:08:19 Marcus Lorentzon wrote: On 01/08/2013 05:36 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: On Tuesday 08 of January 2013 11:12:26 Marcus Lorentzon wrote: [...]

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-02-04 Thread Marcus Lorentzon
On 02/02/2013 12:35 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Marcus, > > On Tuesday 08 January 2013 18:08:19 Marcus Lorentzon wrote: >> On 01/08/2013 05:36 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: >>> On Tuesday 08 of January 2013 11:12:26 Marcus Lorentzon wrote: [...] But it is not perfect. After a couple of products

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-02-04 Thread Marcus Lorentzon
On 02/02/2013 12:35 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: Hi Marcus, On Tuesday 08 January 2013 18:08:19 Marcus Lorentzon wrote: On 01/08/2013 05:36 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: On Tuesday 08 of January 2013 11:12:26 Marcus Lorentzon wrote: [...] But it is not perfect. After a couple of products we realized

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-02-02 Thread Rob Clark
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Rahul, > > On Wednesday 09 January 2013 13:53:30 Rahul Sharma wrote: >> Hi Laurent, >> >> CDF will also be helpful in supporting Panels with integrated audio >> (HDMI/DP) if we can add audio related control operations to >> display_entit

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-02-02 Thread Rob Clark
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Rahul, > > On Wednesday 09 January 2013 13:53:30 Rahul Sharma wrote: >> Hi Laurent, >> >> CDF will also be helpful in supporting Panels with integrated audio >> (HDMI/DP) if we can add audio related control operations to >> display_entit

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-02-02 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Rahul, On Wednesday 09 January 2013 13:53:30 Rahul Sharma wrote: > Hi Laurent, > > CDF will also be helpful in supporting Panels with integrated audio > (HDMI/DP) if we can add audio related control operations to > display_entity_control_ops. Video controls will be called by crtc in DRM/V4L >

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-02-02 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Marcus, On Tuesday 08 January 2013 11:12:26 Marcus Lorentzon wrote: [snip] > I also looked at the video source in Tomi's git tree > (http://gitorious.org/linux-omap-dss2/linux/blobs/work/dss-dev-model-cdf/inc > lude/video/display.h). I think I would prefer a single "setup" op taking a > "stru

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-02-02 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Marcus, On Tuesday 08 January 2013 18:08:19 Marcus Lorentzon wrote: > On 01/08/2013 05:36 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > On Tuesday 08 of January 2013 11:12:26 Marcus Lorentzon wrote: [snip] > >> FYI, > >> here is STE "DSI API": > >> http://www.igloocommunity.org/gitweb/?p=kernel/igloo-kernel.git

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-02-01 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Rahul, On Wednesday 09 January 2013 13:53:30 Rahul Sharma wrote: > Hi Laurent, > > CDF will also be helpful in supporting Panels with integrated audio > (HDMI/DP) if we can add audio related control operations to > display_entity_control_ops. Video controls will be called by crtc in DRM/V4L >

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-02-01 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Marcus, On Tuesday 08 January 2013 11:12:26 Marcus Lorentzon wrote: [snip] > I also looked at the video source in Tomi's git tree > (http://gitorious.org/linux-omap-dss2/linux/blobs/work/dss-dev-model-cdf/inc > lude/video/display.h). I think I would prefer a single "setup" op taking a > "stru

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-02-01 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Marcus, On Tuesday 08 January 2013 18:08:19 Marcus Lorentzon wrote: > On 01/08/2013 05:36 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > On Tuesday 08 of January 2013 11:12:26 Marcus Lorentzon wrote: [snip] > >> FYI, > >> here is STE "DSI API": > >> http://www.igloocommunity.org/gitweb/?p=kernel/igloo-kernel.git

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-01-09 Thread Rahul Sharma
Hi Laurent, CDF will also be helpful in supporting Panels with integrated audio (HDMI/DP) if we can add audio related control operations to display_entity_control_ops. Video controls will be called by crtc in DRM/V4L and audio controls from Alsa. Secondly, if I need to support get_modes operation

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-01-09 Thread Rahul Sharma
Hi Laurent, CDF will also be helpful in supporting Panels with integrated audio (HDMI/DP) if we can add audio related control operations to display_entity_control_ops. Video controls will be called by crtc in DRM/V4L and audio controls from Alsa. Secondly, if I need to support get_modes operation

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-01-09 Thread Rob Clark
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On Thursday 27 December 2012 09:54:55 Rob Clark wrote: >> What I've done to avoid that so far is that the master device registers the >> drivers for it's output sub-devices before registering it's own device. > > I'm not sure to

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-01-08 Thread Marcus Lorentzon
On 01/08/2013 05:36 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > On Tuesday 08 of January 2013 11:12:26 Marcus Lorentzon wrote: >> On 01/08/2013 09:18 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>> On Thursday 27 December 2012 15:43:34 Tomasz Figa wrote: > On Monday 24 of December 2012 15:12:28 Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-01-08 Thread Tomasz Figa
On Tuesday 08 of January 2013 11:12:26 Marcus Lorentzon wrote: > On 01/08/2013 09:18 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Thursday 27 December 2012 15:43:34 Tomasz Figa wrote: > >> > On Monday 24 of December 2012 15:12:28 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >>> > > On Friday 21 December 2012 11:00:52 Tomasz

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-01-08 Thread Marcus Lorentzon
On 01/08/2013 09:18 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Thursday 27 December 2012 15:43:34 Tomasz Figa wrote: >> > On Monday 24 of December 2012 15:12:28 Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>> > > On Friday 21 December 2012 11:00:52 Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > On Tuesday 18 of December 2012 08:31:30 Vika

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-01-08 Thread Rob Clark
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On Thursday 27 December 2012 09:54:55 Rob Clark wrote: >> What I've done to avoid that so far is that the master device registers the >> drivers for it's output sub-devices before registering it's own device. > > I'm not sure to

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-01-08 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Daniel, On Sunday 06 January 2013 18:46:47 Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 09:57:25AM -0600, Rob Clark wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > On the topic of discussions, would anyone be interested in a > > > BoF/brainstorming/whatever session

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-01-08 Thread Laurent Pinchart
On Friday 28 December 2012 01:04:04 Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 01:57:56PM -0600, Rob Clark wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 09:54:55AM -0600, Rob Clark wrote: > > >> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart > >

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-01-08 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Rob, On Thursday 27 December 2012 09:54:55 Rob Clark wrote: > On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Tuesday 18 December 2012 00:21:32 Rob Clark wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> >> Many developers showed interest in the first RFC, a

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-01-08 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Tomasz, On Thursday 27 December 2012 15:43:34 Tomasz Figa wrote: > On Monday 24 of December 2012 15:12:28 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Friday 21 December 2012 11:00:52 Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > On Tuesday 18 of December 2012 08:31:30 Vikas Sajjan wrote: > > > > On 17 December 2012 20:55, Laure

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-01-08 Thread Marcus Lorentzon
On 01/08/2013 05:36 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: On Tuesday 08 of January 2013 11:12:26 Marcus Lorentzon wrote: On 01/08/2013 09:18 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: On Thursday 27 December 2012 15:43:34 Tomasz Figa wrote: On Monday 24 of December 2012 15:12:28 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Friday 2

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-01-08 Thread Tomasz Figa
On Tuesday 08 of January 2013 11:12:26 Marcus Lorentzon wrote: > On 01/08/2013 09:18 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Thursday 27 December 2012 15:43:34 Tomasz Figa wrote: > >> > On Monday 24 of December 2012 15:12:28 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >>> > > On Friday 21 December 2012 11:00:52 Tomasz

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-01-08 Thread Marcus Lorentzon
On 01/08/2013 09:18 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: On Thursday 27 December 2012 15:43:34 Tomasz Figa wrote: > On Monday 24 of December 2012 15:12:28 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Friday 21 December 2012 11:00:52 Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > On Tuesday 18 of December 2012 08:31:30 Vikas Sajjan

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-01-08 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Daniel, On Sunday 06 January 2013 18:46:47 Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 09:57:25AM -0600, Rob Clark wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > On the topic of discussions, would anyone be interested in a > > > BoF/brainstorming/whatever session

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-01-08 Thread Laurent Pinchart
On Friday 28 December 2012 01:04:04 Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 01:57:56PM -0600, Rob Clark wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 09:54:55AM -0600, Rob Clark wrote: > > >> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart > >

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-01-08 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Rob, On Thursday 27 December 2012 09:54:55 Rob Clark wrote: > On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Tuesday 18 December 2012 00:21:32 Rob Clark wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> >> Many developers showed interest in the first RFC, a

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-01-08 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Tomasz, On Thursday 27 December 2012 15:43:34 Tomasz Figa wrote: > On Monday 24 of December 2012 15:12:28 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Friday 21 December 2012 11:00:52 Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > On Tuesday 18 of December 2012 08:31:30 Vikas Sajjan wrote: > > > > On 17 December 2012 20:55, Laure

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-01-06 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 09:57:25AM -0600, Rob Clark wrote: > On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Laurent Pinchart > wrote: > > On the topic of discussions, would anyone be interested in a > > BoF/brainstorming/whatever session during the FOSDEM ? > > I will be at FOSDEM.. and from http://wiki.x.org

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2013-01-06 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 09:57:25AM -0600, Rob Clark wrote: > On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Laurent Pinchart > wrote: > > On the topic of discussions, would anyone be interested in a > > BoF/brainstorming/whatever session during the FOSDEM ? > > I will be at FOSDEM.. and from http://wiki.x.org

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-28 Thread Vikas Sajjan
On 27 December 2012 20:13, Tomasz Figa wrote: > Hi Laurent, > > On Monday 24 of December 2012 15:12:28 Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> Hi Tomasz, >> >> On Friday 21 December 2012 11:00:52 Tomasz Figa wrote: >> > On Tuesday 18 of December 2012 08:31:30 Vikas Sajjan wrote: >> > > On 17 December 2012 20:5

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-28 Thread Vikas Sajjan
On 27 December 2012 20:13, Tomasz Figa wrote: > Hi Laurent, > > On Monday 24 of December 2012 15:12:28 Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> Hi Tomasz, >> >> On Friday 21 December 2012 11:00:52 Tomasz Figa wrote: >> > On Tuesday 18 of December 2012 08:31:30 Vikas Sajjan wrote: >> > > On 17 December 2012 20:5

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-28 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 01:57:56PM -0600, Rob Clark wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Sascha Hauer > wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 09:54:55AM -0600, Rob Clark wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart > > > > This implies that the master driver knows all potential

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-27 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:04:22AM -0600, Rob Clark wrote: > On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Laurent Pinchart > wrote: > > On Wednesday 19 December 2012 16:57:56 Jani Nikula wrote: > >> It just seems to me that, at least from a DRM/KMS perspective, adding > >> another layer (=CDF) for HDMI or DP

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-27 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 09:54:55AM -0600, Rob Clark wrote: > On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart > wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > > > On Tuesday 18 December 2012 00:21:32 Rob Clark wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> >> Many developers showed interest in th

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-27 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 01:57:56PM -0600, Rob Clark wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 09:54:55AM -0600, Rob Clark wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart > > > > This implies that the master driver knows all potential su

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-27 Thread Tomasz Figa
Hi Laurent, On Monday 24 of December 2012 15:12:28 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Tomasz, > > On Friday 21 December 2012 11:00:52 Tomasz Figa wrote: > > On Tuesday 18 of December 2012 08:31:30 Vikas Sajjan wrote: > > > On 17 December 2012 20:55, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > > Hi Vikas, > > > > >

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-27 Thread Rob Clark
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 09:54:55AM -0600, Rob Clark wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart >> wrote: >> > Hi Rob, >> > >> > On Tuesday 18 December 2012 00:21:32 Rob Clark wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dav

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-27 Thread Rob Clark
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 09:54:55AM -0600, Rob Clark wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart >> wrote: >> > Hi Rob, >> > >> > On Tuesday 18 December 2012 00:21:32 Rob Clark wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dav

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-27 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:04:22AM -0600, Rob Clark wrote: > On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Laurent Pinchart > wrote: > > On Wednesday 19 December 2012 16:57:56 Jani Nikula wrote: > >> It just seems to me that, at least from a DRM/KMS perspective, adding > >> another layer (=CDF) for HDMI or DP

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-27 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 09:54:55AM -0600, Rob Clark wrote: > On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart > wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > > > On Tuesday 18 December 2012 00:21:32 Rob Clark wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> >> Many developers showed interest in th

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-27 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Wednesday 19 December 2012 09:26:40 Rob Clark wrote: >> And, there are also external HDMI encoders (for example connected over >> i2c) that can also be shared between boards. So I think there will be >> a number of cases where CDF is

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-27 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Wednesday 19 December 2012 16:57:56 Jani Nikula wrote: >> It just seems to me that, at least from a DRM/KMS perspective, adding >> another layer (=CDF) for HDMI or DP (or legacy outputs) would be >> overengineering it. They are pretty

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-27 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On the topic of discussions, would anyone be interested in a > BoF/brainstorming/whatever session during the FOSDEM ? I will be at FOSDEM.. and from http://wiki.x.org/wiki/fosdem2013 it looks like at least Daniel will be there. If enoug

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-27 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On Tuesday 18 December 2012 00:21:32 Rob Clark wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> Many developers showed interest in the first RFC, and I've had the >> >> opportunity to discuss it with most o

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-27 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Wednesday 19 December 2012 09:26:40 Rob Clark wrote: >> And, there are also external HDMI encoders (for example connected over >> i2c) that can also be shared between boards. So I think there will be >> a number of cases where CDF is

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-27 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Wednesday 19 December 2012 16:57:56 Jani Nikula wrote: >> It just seems to me that, at least from a DRM/KMS perspective, adding >> another layer (=CDF) for HDMI or DP (or legacy outputs) would be >> overengineering it. They are pretty

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-27 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On the topic of discussions, would anyone be interested in a > BoF/brainstorming/whatever session during the FOSDEM ? I will be at FOSDEM.. and from http://wiki.x.org/wiki/fosdem2013 it looks like at least Daniel will be there. If enoug

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-27 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On Tuesday 18 December 2012 00:21:32 Rob Clark wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> Many developers showed interest in the first RFC, and I've had the >> >> opportunity to discuss it with most o

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-27 Thread Tomasz Figa
Hi Laurent, On Monday 24 of December 2012 15:12:28 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Tomasz, > > On Friday 21 December 2012 11:00:52 Tomasz Figa wrote: > > On Tuesday 18 of December 2012 08:31:30 Vikas Sajjan wrote: > > > On 17 December 2012 20:55, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > > Hi Vikas, > > > > >

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Rob, (CC'ing Hans Verkuil) On Wednesday 19 December 2012 10:05:27 Rob Clark wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > On 2012-12-19 17:26, Rob Clark wrote: > >> And, there are also external HDMI encoders (for example connected over > >> i2c) that can also be shared be

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Rob, On Wednesday 19 December 2012 09:26:40 Rob Clark wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> On Monday 17 December 2012 18:53:37 Jani Nikula wrote: > >>> I can see the need for a framework for DSI panels and such (in fa

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Tomi, On Wednesday 19 December 2012 17:07:50 Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 2012-12-19 16:57, Jani Nikula wrote: > > It just seems to me that, at least from a DRM/KMS perspective, adding > > another layer (=CDF) for HDMI or DP (or legacy outputs) would be > > overengineering it. They are pretty wel

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Jani, On Wednesday 19 December 2012 16:57:56 Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Monday 17 December 2012 18:53:37 Jani Nikula wrote: > >> I can see the need for a framework for DSI panels and such (in fact Tomi > >> and I have talked about it like 2-3 years

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Sylwester, On Tuesday 18 December 2012 11:59:35 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > On 12/18/2012 07:21 AM, Rob Clark wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> So this might be a bit off topic but this whole CDF triggered me > >> looking at stuff I generally avoid: > >> > >

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Marcus, On Tuesday 18 December 2012 11:39:11 Marcus Lorentzon wrote: > On 12/18/2012 06:04 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> Many developers showed interest in the first RFC, and I've had the > >> opportunity to discuss it with most of them. I would like to thank (in > >> no particular order) Tomi Va

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Tomasz, On Friday 21 December 2012 11:00:52 Tomasz Figa wrote: > On Tuesday 18 of December 2012 08:31:30 Vikas Sajjan wrote: > > On 17 December 2012 20:55, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > Hi Vikas, > > > > > > Sorry for the late reply. I now have more time to work on CDF, so > > > delays should

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Inki, On Tuesday 18 December 2012 18:38:31 Inki Dae wrote: > 2012/12/18 Daniel Vetter > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Rob Clark wrote: > > >> The other thing I'd like you guys to do is kill the idea of fbdev and > > >> v4l drivers that are "shared" with the drm codebase, really just > >

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Daniel, On Tuesday 18 December 2012 09:30:00 Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Rob Clark wrote: > >> The other thing I'd like you guys to do is kill the idea of fbdev and > >> v4l drivers that are "shared" with the drm codebase, really just > >> implement fbdev and v4l on

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Rob, On Tuesday 18 December 2012 00:21:32 Rob Clark wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> Many developers showed interest in the first RFC, and I've had the > >> opportunity to discuss it with most of them. I would like to thank (in > >> no particular order) Tomi V

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Dave, On Tuesday 18 December 2012 15:04:02 Dave Airlie wrote: > > Many developers showed interest in the first RFC, and I've had the > > opportunity to discuss it with most of them. I would like to thank (in no > > particular order) Tomi Valkeinen for all the time he spend helping me to > > dra

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Vikas, On Tuesday 18 December 2012 08:31:30 Vikas Sajjan wrote: > On 17 December 2012 20:55, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Vikas, > > > > Sorry for the late reply. I now have more time to work on CDF, so delays > > should be much shorter. > > > > On Thursday 06 December 2012 10:51:15 Vikas S

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Rob, (CC'ing Hans Verkuil) On Wednesday 19 December 2012 10:05:27 Rob Clark wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > On 2012-12-19 17:26, Rob Clark wrote: > >> And, there are also external HDMI encoders (for example connected over > >> i2c) that can also be shared be

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Rob, On Wednesday 19 December 2012 09:26:40 Rob Clark wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> On Monday 17 December 2012 18:53:37 Jani Nikula wrote: > >>> I can see the need for a framework for DSI panels and such (in fa

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Tomi, On Wednesday 19 December 2012 17:07:50 Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 2012-12-19 16:57, Jani Nikula wrote: > > It just seems to me that, at least from a DRM/KMS perspective, adding > > another layer (=CDF) for HDMI or DP (or legacy outputs) would be > > overengineering it. They are pretty wel

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Jani, On Wednesday 19 December 2012 16:57:56 Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Monday 17 December 2012 18:53:37 Jani Nikula wrote: > >> I can see the need for a framework for DSI panels and such (in fact Tomi > >> and I have talked about it like 2-3 years

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Sylwester, On Tuesday 18 December 2012 11:59:35 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > On 12/18/2012 07:21 AM, Rob Clark wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> So this might be a bit off topic but this whole CDF triggered me > >> looking at stuff I generally avoid: > >> > >

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Marcus, On Tuesday 18 December 2012 11:39:11 Marcus Lorentzon wrote: > On 12/18/2012 06:04 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> Many developers showed interest in the first RFC, and I've had the > >> opportunity to discuss it with most of them. I would like to thank (in > >> no particular order) Tomi Va

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Tomasz, On Friday 21 December 2012 11:00:52 Tomasz Figa wrote: > On Tuesday 18 of December 2012 08:31:30 Vikas Sajjan wrote: > > On 17 December 2012 20:55, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > Hi Vikas, > > > > > > Sorry for the late reply. I now have more time to work on CDF, so > > > delays should

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Inki, On Tuesday 18 December 2012 18:38:31 Inki Dae wrote: > 2012/12/18 Daniel Vetter > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Rob Clark wrote: > > >> The other thing I'd like you guys to do is kill the idea of fbdev and > > >> v4l drivers that are "shared" with the drm codebase, really just > >

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Daniel, On Tuesday 18 December 2012 09:30:00 Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Rob Clark wrote: > >> The other thing I'd like you guys to do is kill the idea of fbdev and > >> v4l drivers that are "shared" with the drm codebase, really just > >> implement fbdev and v4l on

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Rob, On Tuesday 18 December 2012 00:21:32 Rob Clark wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> Many developers showed interest in the first RFC, and I've had the > >> opportunity to discuss it with most of them. I would like to thank (in > >> no particular order) Tomi V

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Dave, On Tuesday 18 December 2012 15:04:02 Dave Airlie wrote: > > Many developers showed interest in the first RFC, and I've had the > > opportunity to discuss it with most of them. I would like to thank (in no > > particular order) Tomi Valkeinen for all the time he spend helping me to > > dra

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Vikas, On Tuesday 18 December 2012 08:31:30 Vikas Sajjan wrote: > On 17 December 2012 20:55, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Vikas, > > > > Sorry for the late reply. I now have more time to work on CDF, so delays > > should be much shorter. > > > > On Thursday 06 December 2012 10:51:15 Vikas S

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-21 Thread Tomasz Figa
Hi Vikas, On Tuesday 18 of December 2012 08:31:30 Vikas Sajjan wrote: > Hi Laurent, > > Thanks for the reply. > > On 17 December 2012 20:55, Laurent Pinchart < > > laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com> wrote: > > Hi Vikas, > > > > Sorry for the late reply. I now have more time to work on CDF,

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-21 Thread Tomasz Figa
Hi Vikas, On Tuesday 18 of December 2012 08:31:30 Vikas Sajjan wrote: > Hi Laurent, > > Thanks for the reply. > > On 17 December 2012 20:55, Laurent Pinchart < > > laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com> wrote: > > Hi Vikas, > > > > Sorry for the late reply. I now have more time to work on CDF, so

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-20 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 2012-12-19 17:26, Rob Clark wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Jani Nikula > wrote: >> >> Hi Laurent - >> >> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Laurent Pinchart >> wrote: >>> Hi Jani, >>> >>> On Monday 17 December 2012 18:53:37 Jani Nikula wrote: I can see the need for a framework for DSI panel

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-20 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 2012-12-19 16:57, Jani Nikula wrote: > It just seems to me that, at least from a DRM/KMS perspective, adding > another layer (=CDF) for HDMI or DP (or legacy outputs) would be > overengineering it. They are pretty well standardized, and I don't see > there would be a need to write multiple disp

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-19 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 2012-12-19 17:26, Rob Clark wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Jani Nikula > wrote: >> >> Hi Laurent - >> >> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Laurent Pinchart >> wrote: >>> Hi Jani, >>> >>> On Monday 17 December 2012 18:53:37 Jani Nikula wrote: I can see the need for a framework for DSI panel

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-19 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 2012-12-19 16:57, Jani Nikula wrote: > It just seems to me that, at least from a DRM/KMS perspective, adding > another layer (=CDF) for HDMI or DP (or legacy outputs) would be > overengineering it. They are pretty well standardized, and I don't see > there would be a need to write multiple disp

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-19 Thread Jani Nikula
Hi Laurent - On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Jani, > > On Monday 17 December 2012 18:53:37 Jani Nikula wrote: >> I can see the need for a framework for DSI panels and such (in fact Tomi >> and I have talked about it like 2-3 years ago already!) but what is the >> story for HDM

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-19 Thread Stéphane Marchesin
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Inki Dae wrote: > > > 2012/12/18 Daniel Vetter >> >> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Rob Clark wrote: >> >> The other thing I'd like you guys to do is kill the idea of fbdev and >> >> v4l drivers that are "shared" with the drm codebase, really just >> >> impleme

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-19 Thread Stéphane Marchesin
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Rob Clark wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >>> >>> Many developers showed interest in the first RFC, and I've had the >>> opportunity >>> to discuss it with most of them. I would like to thank (in no particular >>> order) Tomi Valkei

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-19 Thread Stéphane Marchesin
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Inki Dae wrote: > > > 2012/12/18 Daniel Vetter >> >> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Rob Clark wrote: >> >> The other thing I'd like you guys to do is kill the idea of fbdev and >> >> v4l drivers that are "shared" with the drm codebase, really just >> >> impleme

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-19 Thread Stéphane Marchesin
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Rob Clark wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >>> >>> Many developers showed interest in the first RFC, and I've had the >>> opportunity >>> to discuss it with most of them. I would like to thank (in no particular >>> order) Tomi Valkei

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-19 Thread Rob Clark
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 2012-12-19 17:26, Rob Clark wrote: >> >> And, there are also external HDMI encoders (for example connected over >> i2c) that can also be shared between boards. So I think there will be >> a number of cases where CDF is appropriate for H

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-19 Thread Rob Clark
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Hi Laurent - > > On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Laurent Pinchart > wrote: >> Hi Jani, >> >> On Monday 17 December 2012 18:53:37 Jani Nikula wrote: >>> I can see the need for a framework for DSI panels and such (in fact Tomi >>> and I have talked abou

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-19 Thread Rob Clark
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 2012-12-19 17:26, Rob Clark wrote: >> >> And, there are also external HDMI encoders (for example connected over >> i2c) that can also be shared between boards. So I think there will be >> a number of cases where CDF is appropriate for HD

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-19 Thread Rob Clark
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Hi Laurent - > > On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Laurent Pinchart > wrote: >> Hi Jani, >> >> On Monday 17 December 2012 18:53:37 Jani Nikula wrote: >>> I can see the need for a framework for DSI panels and such (in fact Tomi >>> and I have talked abou

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-19 Thread Jani Nikula
Hi Laurent - On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Jani, > > On Monday 17 December 2012 18:53:37 Jani Nikula wrote: >> I can see the need for a framework for DSI panels and such (in fact Tomi >> and I have talked about it like 2-3 years ago already!) but what is the >> story for HDMI

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-18 Thread Inki Dae
2012/12/18 Daniel Vetter > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Rob Clark wrote: > >> The other thing I'd like you guys to do is kill the idea of fbdev and > >> v4l drivers that are "shared" with the drm codebase, really just > >> implement fbdev and v4l on top of the drm layer, some people might >

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-18 Thread Dave Airlie
> > Many developers showed interest in the first RFC, and I've had the opportunity > to discuss it with most of them. I would like to thank (in no particular > order) Tomi Valkeinen for all the time he spend helping me to draft v2, Marcus > Lorentzon for his useful input during Linaro Connect Q4 20

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-18 Thread Sylwester Nawrocki
On 12/18/2012 07:21 AM, Rob Clark wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> So this might be a bit off topic but this whole CDF triggered me >> looking at stuff I generally avoid: >> >> The biggest problem I'm having currently with the whole ARM graphics >> and output world

[RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-18 Thread Vikas Sajjan
Hi All, On 17 December 2012 20:55, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Vikas, > > Sorry for the late reply. I now have more time to work on CDF, so delays > should be much shorter. > > On Thursday 06 December 2012 10:51:15 Vikas Sajjan wrote: > > Hi Laurent, > > > > I was thinking of porting CDF to sa

  1   2   >