[RFC v2 PATCH 08/14] drm/exynos: dsi: add driver data to support Exynos5420

2014-04-27 Thread YoungJun Cho
Hi Andrzej, On 04/24/2014 10:23 AM, YoungJun Cho wrote: > Hi Andrzej, > > Thank you for comments. > > On 04/23/2014 05:29 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >> On 04/21/2014 02:28 PM, YoungJun Cho wrote: >>> The offset of register DSIM_PLLTMR_REG in Exynos5420 is different >>> from the one in Exynos4 SoC. >

[RFC v2 PATCH 08/14] drm/exynos: dsi: add driver data to support Exynos5420

2014-04-24 Thread YoungJun Cho
Hi Andrzej, Thank you for comments. On 04/23/2014 05:29 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > On 04/21/2014 02:28 PM, YoungJun Cho wrote: >> The offset of register DSIM_PLLTMR_REG in Exynos5420 is different >> from the one in Exynos4 SoC. >> >> In case of Exynos5420 SoC, there is no frequency band bit in >

[RFC v2 PATCH 08/14] drm/exynos: dsi: add driver data to support Exynos5420

2014-04-23 Thread Andrzej Hajda
On 04/21/2014 02:28 PM, YoungJun Cho wrote: > The offset of register DSIM_PLLTMR_REG in Exynos5420 is different > from the one in Exynos4 SoC. > > In case of Exynos5420 SoC, there is no frequency band bit in DSIM_PLLCTRL_REG, > and it uses DSIM_PHYCTRL_REG and DSIM_PHYTIMING*_REG instead. > So this

[RFC v2 PATCH 08/14] drm/exynos: dsi: add driver data to support Exynos5420

2014-04-21 Thread YoungJun Cho
The offset of register DSIM_PLLTMR_REG in Exynos5420 is different from the one in Exynos4 SoC. In case of Exynos5420 SoC, there is no frequency band bit in DSIM_PLLCTRL_REG, and it uses DSIM_PHYCTRL_REG and DSIM_PHYTIMING*_REG instead. So this patch adds driver data to distinguish it. Signed-off-