> But i have to say there are so many code not follow the kernel code-style in
> amdgpu module.
> And also the ./scripts/checkpatch.pl did not throw any warning or error.
Will such information become more interesting for further evolution
in the affected software areas?
Regards,
Markus
>> But i have to say there are so many code not follow the kernel code-style in
>> amdgpu module.
>> And also the ./scripts/checkpatch.pl did not throw any warning or error.
>
> That is unfortunately true, yes. But we try to push new code through the
> usual code review and improve things as we
>>> There is no need to if check again, maybe we could merge
>>> into the above else branch.
I find also this commit message still improvable (besides the mentioned
implementation details around coding style concerns).
How will corresponding review comments be taken better into account?
Regards,
There is no need to if check again, maybe we could merge
into the above else branch.
Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao
Changes since V1:
*commit message improve
*code style refactoring
Changes since V2:
*code style adjust
Link for V1:
*https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1226587/
---
.@vger.kernel.org
Cc: opensource.ker...@vivo.com,Bernard Zhao
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] amdgpu: remove unnecessary condition check>Am 21.04.20
um 10:03 schrieb Bernard Zhao:
>> There is no need to if check again, maybe we could merge
>> into the above else branch.
>>
>> Sign
Am 21.04.20 um 10:44 schrieb 赵军奎:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
index 9dff792c9290..5424bd921a7b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
+++
Am 21.04.20 um 10:03 schrieb Bernard Zhao:
There is no need to if check again, maybe we could merge
into the above else branch.
Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao
Changes since V1:
*commit message improve
*code style refactoring
Changes since V2:
*code style adjust
Link for V1:
