On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Sorry for missing your report here. Before we disable this again for
> gen4 I want to make sure that it's the same irq misrouting issue which
> was already the cause for the gmbus irq mess. Can you please boot with
> pci=nomsi (so that i915 uses irq16)?
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Jani Nikula wrote:
>
>> >> > git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux drm-next
>> >> [ ... snip ... ]
>> >> > Daniel Vetter (59):
>> >> [ ... snip ... ]
>> >> > drm/i915: dp aux irq support for g4x/vlv
>> >>
>> >>
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> > git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux drm-next
> >> [ ... snip ... ]
> >> > Daniel Vetter (59):
> >> [ ... snip ... ]
> >> > drm/i915: dp aux irq support for g4x/vlv
> >>
> >> This commit causes all kinds of havoc on my ThinkPad x200s.
On Fri, 07 Feb 2014, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>
>> > git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux drm-next
>> [ ... snip ... ]
>> > Daniel Vetter (59):
>> [ ... snip ... ]
>> > drm/i915: dp aux irq support for g4x/vlv
>>
>> This commit causes all kinds
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux drm-next
> [ ... snip ... ]
> > Daniel Vetter (59):
> [ ... snip ... ]
> > drm/i915: dp aux irq support for g4x/vlv
>
> This commit causes all kinds of havoc on my ThinkPad x200s. It results in
[ ...
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Dave Airlie wrote:
> git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux drm-next
[ ... snip ... ]
> Daniel Vetter (59):
[ ... snip ... ]
> drm/i915: dp aux irq support for g4x/vlv
This commit causes all kinds of havoc on my ThinkPad x200s. It results in
irq 16: nobody
Dave Airlie schreef op do 30-01-2014 om 02:49 [+]:
> Christian K?nig (10):
> [...]
> drm/radeon: add GART debugfs access v3
> [...]
That one generates a bit of (warning) noise when building on 32 bits
x86:
In file included from include/asm-generic/bug.h:13:0,
Hi Linus,
Been a bit busy, first week of kids school, and waiting on other trees to go in
before I could send this, so its a bit later than I'd normally like.
For some reason the request-pull and the merge into your tree look different,
since some of the changes in this have already gone in
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> For some reason the request-pull and the merge into your tree look different,
> since some of the changes in this have already gone in via the arm-soc tree
> and dma stuff, all for tegra. Hopefully nobody rebased when they shouldn't.
Looks
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Jesse Barnes
wrote:
>
> Chris mentioned a7a75c8f7 on irc, not sure if it was regarding this
> issue though, but it does seem a likely candidate.
Yup, that revert fixes it for me.
Linus
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> So I had ?hoped - yes, very na?ve of me, I know - that this merge
> window would be different.
>
> But it's not.
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> i915: big 855 fix, lots of output setup refactoring, lots of
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Stephen Clark
wrote:
> On 03/22/2011 10:19 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>
>> So I had ?hoped - yes, very na?ve of me, I know - that this merge
>> window would be different.
>>
>> But it's not.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Dave Airlie ?wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:29:35 -0700
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> >
> > Keith/Jesse/Chris - I don't know that it's i915, and it will take
> > forever to bisect (I'll try). But it does seem pretty likely.
>
> Ok, so I'm still bisecting, but
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> Keith/Jesse/Chris - I don't know that it's i915, and it will take
> forever to bisect (I'll try). But it does seem pretty likely.
Ok, so I'm still bisecting, but it's definitely the DRM pull. Current
bisection log attached (the result
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:21:53 -0400
Stephen Clark wrote:
> On 03/22/2011 10:19 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > So I had hoped - yes, very na?ve of me, I know - that this merge
> > window would be different.
> >
> > But it's not.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
On 03/22/2011 10:19 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So I had hoped - yes, very na?ve of me, I know - that this merge
> window would be different.
>
> But it's not.
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
>> i915: big 855 fix, lots of output setup refactoring, lots of misc
On 03/22/2011 10:19 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
So I had hoped - yes, very naïve of me, I know - that this merge
window would be different.
But it's not.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Dave Airlieairl...@linux.ie wrote:
i915: big 855 fix, lots of output setup refactoring, lots of misc
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
So I had hoped - yes, very naïve of me, I know - that this merge
window would be different.
But it's not.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@linux.ie wrote:
i915: big 855 fix, lots of
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:21:53 -0400
Stephen Clark sclar...@earthlink.net wrote:
On 03/22/2011 10:19 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
So I had hoped - yes, very naïve of me, I know - that this merge
window would be different.
But it's not.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Dave
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
Keith/Jesse/Chris - I don't know that it's i915, and it will take
forever to bisect (I'll try). But it does seem pretty likely.
Ok, so I'm still bisecting, but it's definitely the DRM pull. Current
bisection
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:29:35 -0700
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
Keith/Jesse/Chris - I don't know that it's i915, and it will take
forever to bisect (I'll try). But it does seem
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
Chris mentioned a7a75c8f7 on irc, not sure if it was regarding this
issue though, but it does seem a likely candidate.
Yup, that revert fixes it for me.
Linus
So I had hoped - yes, very na?ve of me, I know - that this merge
window would be different.
But it's not.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> i915: big 855 fix, lots of output setup refactoring, lots of misc fixes.
.. and apparently a lot of breakage too. My crappy laptop
Hi Linus,
since I see drm named in two other pull threads (staging + bkl) I suppose
I should send my pull req.
Highlights:
core: drop i830 driver and BKL, add support to drm core to allow USB drm
drivers, generic unaccelerated buffer create/map fns for simple fbdev
applications (like
Hi Linus,
since I see drm named in two other pull threads (staging + bkl) I suppose
I should send my pull req.
Highlights:
core: drop i830 driver and BKL, add support to drm core to allow USB drm
drivers, generic unaccelerated buffer create/map fns for simple fbdev
applications (like
25 matches
Mail list logo
