On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:32 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 05:11:02PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> Until now, the drm-intel commit access have been handed out ad hoc,
>>> without transparency, consistency, or fairness. With pressure
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 05:11:02PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Until now, the drm-intel commit access have been handed out ad hoc,
>> without transparency, consistency, or fairness. With pressure to add
>> more committers, this is no longer tenable, if
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 05:11:02PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Until now, the drm-intel commit access have been handed out ad hoc,
> without transparency, consistency, or fairness. With pressure to add
> more committers, this is no longer tenable, if it ever was. Document the
> requirements and exp
Until now, the drm-intel commit access have been handed out ad hoc,
without transparency, consistency, or fairness. With pressure to add
more committers, this is no longer tenable, if it ever was. Document the
requirements and expectations around becoming a drm-intel committer.
The Linux kernel op
