On 12/14/23 20:03, Mina Almasry wrote:
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 12:37 PM Pavel Begunkov wrote:
...
If you remove the branch, let it fall into ->release and rely
on refcounting there, then the callback could also fix up
release_cnt or ask pp to do it, like in the patch I linked above
Sadly I
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 12:37 PM Pavel Begunkov wrote:
...
> >> If you remove the branch, let it fall into ->release and rely
> >> on refcounting there, then the callback could also fix up
> >> release_cnt or ask pp to do it, like in the patch I linked above
> >>
> >
> > Sadly I don't think this
On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 16:52:39 -0800, Mina Almasry wrote:
<...>
> +static int mp_dmabuf_devmem_init(struct page_pool *pool)
> +{
> + struct netdev_dmabuf_binding *binding = pool->mp_priv;
> +
> + if (!binding)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!(pool->p.flags &
On 12/12/23 6:09 PM, Mina Almasry wrote:
> OK, I imagine this is not that hard to implement - it's really whether
> the change is acceptable to reviewers.
>
> I figure I can start by implementing a no-op abstraction to page*:
>
> typedef struct page netmem_t
>
> and replace the page* in the
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 7:08 AM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 06:58:17AM -0800, Mina Almasry wrote:
>
> > Jason, we set the LSB on page_pool_iov pointers before casting it to
> > struct page pointers. The resulting pointers are not useable as page
> > pointers at all.
>
> I
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 06:58:17AM -0800, Mina Almasry wrote:
> Jason, we set the LSB on page_pool_iov pointers before casting it to
> struct page pointers. The resulting pointers are not useable as page
> pointers at all.
I understand that, the second ask is about maintainability of the mm
by
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 6:39 AM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 06:26:51AM -0800, Mina Almasry wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 4:25 AM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 04:52:39PM -0800, Mina Almasry wrote:
> > >
> > > > +static inline struct
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 06:26:51AM -0800, Mina Almasry wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 4:25 AM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 04:52:39PM -0800, Mina Almasry wrote:
> >
> > > +static inline struct page_pool_iov *page_to_page_pool_iov(struct page
> > > *page)
> > > +{
> >
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 4:25 AM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 04:52:39PM -0800, Mina Almasry wrote:
>
> > +static inline struct page_pool_iov *page_to_page_pool_iov(struct page
> > *page)
> > +{
> > + if (page_is_page_pool_iov(page))
> > + return (struct
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 04:52:39PM -0800, Mina Almasry wrote:
> +static inline struct page_pool_iov *page_to_page_pool_iov(struct page *page)
> +{
> + if (page_is_page_pool_iov(page))
> + return (struct page_pool_iov *)((unsigned long)page & ~PP_IOV);
> +
> +
On 12/11/23 02:30, Mina Almasry wrote:
On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 7:05 PM Pavel Begunkov wrote:
On 12/8/23 23:25, Mina Almasry wrote:
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 2:56 PM Pavel Begunkov wrote:
On 12/8/23 00:52, Mina Almasry wrote:
...
+ if (pool->p.queue)
+ binding =
On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 7:05 PM Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>
> On 12/8/23 23:25, Mina Almasry wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 2:56 PM Pavel Begunkov
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/8/23 00:52, Mina Almasry wrote:
> > ...
> >>> + if (pool->p.queue)
> >>> + binding =
On 12/8/23 23:25, Mina Almasry wrote:
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 2:56 PM Pavel Begunkov wrote:
On 12/8/23 00:52, Mina Almasry wrote:
...
+ if (pool->p.queue)
+ binding = READ_ONCE(pool->p.queue->binding);
+
+ if (binding) {
+ pool->mp_ops = _devmem_ops;
+
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 2:56 PM Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>
> On 12/8/23 00:52, Mina Almasry wrote:
...
> > + if (pool->p.queue)
> > + binding = READ_ONCE(pool->p.queue->binding);
> > +
> > + if (binding) {
> > + pool->mp_ops = _devmem_ops;
> > +
On 12/8/23 00:52, Mina Almasry wrote:
Implement a memory provider that allocates dmabuf devmem page_pool_iovs.
The provider receives a reference to the struct netdev_dmabuf_binding
via the pool->mp_priv pointer. The driver needs to set this pointer for
the provider in the page_pool_params.
The
On 12/8/23 00:52, Mina Almasry wrote:
Implement a memory provider that allocates dmabuf devmem page_pool_iovs.
The provider receives a reference to the struct netdev_dmabuf_binding
via the pool->mp_priv pointer. The driver needs to set this pointer for
the provider in the page_pool_params.
The
Implement a memory provider that allocates dmabuf devmem page_pool_iovs.
The provider receives a reference to the struct netdev_dmabuf_binding
via the pool->mp_priv pointer. The driver needs to set this pointer for
the provider in the page_pool_params.
The provider obtains a reference on the
17 matches
Mail list logo
