[pull] tilcdc-next for 3.9

2013-02-18 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:16:50PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 2013-02-18 12:03, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > >> But my main concern for this series is still that it creates custom > >> panel stuff, and adds DT bindings for them. Which me

[pull] tilcdc-next for 3.9

2013-02-18 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 2013-02-18 14:35, Rob Clark wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> On 2013-02-18 14:26, Rob Clark wrote: >> >>> So I'm not going to get too hung up on supporting current DT bindings >>> in the future when we have something better. But I needed something >> >> I may

[pull] tilcdc-next for 3.9

2013-02-18 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 2013-02-18 14:26, Rob Clark wrote: > So I'm not going to get too hung up on supporting current DT bindings > in the future when we have something better. But I needed something I may be mistaken, but my understanding is that DT bindings are like kernel's userspace APIs. After they have been m

[pull] tilcdc-next for 3.9

2013-02-18 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 2013-02-18 12:03, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> But my main concern for this series is still that it creates custom >> panel stuff, and adds DT bindings for them. Which means we need to >> support those custom DT bindings in the future, even t

[pull] tilcdc-next for 3.9

2013-02-18 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > But my main concern for this series is still that it creates custom > panel stuff, and adds DT bindings for them. Which means we need to > support those custom DT bindings in the future, even though it's quite > sure that CDF should be used

[pull] tilcdc-next for 3.9

2013-02-18 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 2013-02-18 01:02, Rob Clark wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Here is pull request for tilcdc drm driver.. it also includes a > handful of dependent patches from me, plus a couple fixes from Daniel > Vetter which haven't showed up yet in drm-next. Why is the TFP410 driver integrated into the tilcdc, but

[pull] tilcdc-next for 3.9

2013-02-18 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 2013-02-18 14:35, Rob Clark wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >>> On 2013-02-18 14:26, Rob Clark wrote: >>> So I'm not going to get too hung up on supporting current DT bindings in the future when

Re: [pull] tilcdc-next for 3.9

2013-02-18 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:16:50PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 2013-02-18 12:03, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > >> But my main concern for this series is still that it creates custom > >> panel stuff, and adds DT bindings for them. Which me

[pull] tilcdc-next for 3.9

2013-02-18 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 2013-02-18 14:26, Rob Clark wrote: > >> So I'm not going to get too hung up on supporting current DT bindings >> in the future when we have something better. But I needed something > > I may be mistaken, but my understanding is that DT b

[pull] tilcdc-next for 3.9

2013-02-18 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> But my main concern for this series is still that it creates custom >> panel stuff, and adds DT bindings for them. Which means we need to >> support those custom DT bindings in the f

[pull] tilcdc-next for 3.9

2013-02-18 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 2013-02-18 01:02, Rob Clark wrote: >> Hi Dave, >> >> Here is pull request for tilcdc drm driver.. it also includes a >> handful of dependent patches from me, plus a couple fixes from Daniel >> Vetter which haven't showed up yet in drm-ne

Re: [pull] tilcdc-next for 3.9

2013-02-18 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 2013-02-18 14:35, Rob Clark wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >>> On 2013-02-18 14:26, Rob Clark wrote: >>> So I'm not going to get too hung up on supporting current DT bindings in the future when

Re: [pull] tilcdc-next for 3.9

2013-02-18 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 2013-02-18 14:35, Rob Clark wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> On 2013-02-18 14:26, Rob Clark wrote: >> >>> So I'm not going to get too hung up on supporting current DT bindings >>> in the future when we have something better. But I needed something >> >> I may

Re: [pull] tilcdc-next for 3.9

2013-02-18 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 2013-02-18 14:26, Rob Clark wrote: > >> So I'm not going to get too hung up on supporting current DT bindings >> in the future when we have something better. But I needed something > > I may be mistaken, but my understanding is that DT b

Re: [pull] tilcdc-next for 3.9

2013-02-18 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> But my main concern for this series is still that it creates custom >> panel stuff, and adds DT bindings for them. Which means we need to >> support those custom DT bindings in the f

Re: [pull] tilcdc-next for 3.9

2013-02-18 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 2013-02-18 14:26, Rob Clark wrote: > So I'm not going to get too hung up on supporting current DT bindings > in the future when we have something better. But I needed something I may be mistaken, but my understanding is that DT bindings are like kernel's userspace APIs. After they have been m

Re: [pull] tilcdc-next for 3.9

2013-02-18 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 2013-02-18 01:02, Rob Clark wrote: >> Hi Dave, >> >> Here is pull request for tilcdc drm driver.. it also includes a >> handful of dependent patches from me, plus a couple fixes from Daniel >> Vetter which haven't showed up yet in drm-ne

Re: [pull] tilcdc-next for 3.9

2013-02-18 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 2013-02-18 12:03, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> But my main concern for this series is still that it creates custom >> panel stuff, and adds DT bindings for them. Which means we need to >> support those custom DT bindings in the future, even t

Re: [pull] tilcdc-next for 3.9

2013-02-18 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > But my main concern for this series is still that it creates custom > panel stuff, and adds DT bindings for them. Which means we need to > support those custom DT bindings in the future, even though it's quite > sure that CDF should be used

Re: [pull] tilcdc-next for 3.9

2013-02-18 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 2013-02-18 01:02, Rob Clark wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Here is pull request for tilcdc drm driver.. it also includes a > handful of dependent patches from me, plus a couple fixes from Daniel > Vetter which haven't showed up yet in drm-next. Why is the TFP410 driver integrated into the tilcdc, but

[pull] tilcdc-next for 3.9

2013-02-17 Thread Rob Clark
Hi Dave, Here is pull request for tilcdc drm driver.. it also includes a handful of dependent patches from me, plus a couple fixes from Daniel Vetter which haven't showed up yet in drm-next. -- The following changes since commit 3314fdf8b44bd4914050614fa2c56b7c587fabc2: Merge branch '

[pull] tilcdc-next for 3.9

2013-02-17 Thread Rob Clark
Hi Dave, Here is pull request for tilcdc drm driver.. it also includes a handful of dependent patches from me, plus a couple fixes from Daniel Vetter which haven't showed up yet in drm-next. -- The following changes since commit 3314fdf8b44bd4914050614fa2c56b7c587fabc2: Merge branch '