On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 03:52:36PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 11:09:35AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > On 10/18/23 07:10, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> > Yes I should be able to find a device or 2 which poke GPIOs from the
> > VBT MIPI sequences. Unfortunately I
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 11:09:35AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 10/18/23 07:10, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > DSI code for VBT has a set of ugly GPIO hacks, one of which is direct
> > talking to GPIO IP behind the actual driver's back. An attempt to fix
> > that is here.
> >
> > If I understood
Hi Andy,
On 10/18/23 07:10, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> DSI code for VBT has a set of ugly GPIO hacks, one of which is direct
> talking to GPIO IP behind the actual driver's back. An attempt to fix
> that is here.
>
> If I understood correctly, my approach should work in the similar way as
> the
DSI code for VBT has a set of ugly GPIO hacks, one of which is direct
talking to GPIO IP behind the actual driver's back. An attempt to fix
that is here.
If I understood correctly, my approach should work in the similar way as
the current IOSF GPIO.
Hans, I believe you have some devices that
