On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:14:01 +0200
Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> Hi Florian, all -
>
> First, thanks for your work on adding the bugzilla comments when patches
> referencing bugs get merged. I find it useful.
>
> Recently however there was a comment about a commit referencing a commit
> referencing t
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 07:35:45PM +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:14:01 +0200
> Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Florian, all -
> >
> > First, thanks for your work on adding the bugzilla comments when patches
> > referencing bugs get merged. I find it useful.
> >
> > Rec
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 07:35:45PM +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:14:01 +0200
> Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Florian, all -
> >
> > First, thanks for your work on adding the bugzilla comments when patches
> > referencing bugs get merged. I find it useful.
> >
> > Rec
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:14:01 +0200
Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> Hi Florian, all -
>
> First, thanks for your work on adding the bugzilla comments when patches
> referencing bugs get merged. I find it useful.
>
> Recently however there was a comment about a commit referencing a commit
> referencing t
Hi Florian, all -
First, thanks for your work on adding the bugzilla comments when patches
referencing bugs get merged. I find it useful.
Recently however there was a comment about a commit referencing a commit
referencing the bug report. Turns out the comment was missing one level
of indirectio
Hi Florian, all -
First, thanks for your work on adding the bugzilla comments when patches
referencing bugs get merged. I find it useful.
Recently however there was a comment about a commit referencing a commit
referencing the bug report. Turns out the comment was missing one level
of indirectio
