On Thu, 22 Nov 2012, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> Yeah, the utter lack of a vbt fits very nicely, thanks for checking,
>> I've merged the patch into drm-intel-fixes and will forward it for
>> inclusion into 3.7 rsn.
>
> Great, thanks. One thing about that patch: if we would ever encounter
> a non-zero
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> Yeah, the utter lack of a vbt fits very nicely, thanks for checking,
>> I've merged the patch into drm-intel-fixes and will forward it for
>> inclusion into 3.7 rsn.
>
> Great, thanks. One thing about that patch: if we would ever encounter
> a non-zero
> Yeah, the utter lack of a vbt fits very nicely, thanks for checking,
> I've merged the patch into drm-intel-fixes and will forward it for
> inclusion into 3.7 rsn.
Great, thanks. One thing about that patch: if we would ever encounter
a non-zero edp.bpp < 3, display_bpc would not be clamped. I su
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> >> My apologies for the long delay in answering, I've somehow mixed up
>> >> different bugreports and thought I've sent you a patch to test
>> >> already. Anyway, please test
>> >>
>> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1728111/
>> >
>> >
Hi Daniel,
> >> My apologies for the long delay in answering, I've somehow mixed up
> >> different bugreports and thought I've sent you a patch to test
> >> already. Anyway, please test
> >>
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1728111/
> >
> > Tested-by: Henrik Rydberg
>
> Can you please
Hi Daniel,
> My apologies for the long delay in answering, I've somehow mixed up
> different bugreports and thought I've sent you a patch to test
> already. Anyway, please test
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1728111/
Tested-by: Henrik Rydberg
Thanks,
Henrik
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> My apologies for the long delay in answering, I've somehow mixed up
>> different bugreports and thought I've sent you a patch to test
>> already. Anyway, please test
>>
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1728111/
>
> Tested-by: Henr
> Yeah, the utter lack of a vbt fits very nicely, thanks for checking,
> I've merged the patch into drm-intel-fixes and will forward it for
> inclusion into 3.7 rsn.
Great, thanks. One thing about that patch: if we would ever encounter
a non-zero edp.bpp < 3, display_bpc would not be clamped. I su
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> >> My apologies for the long delay in answering, I've somehow mixed up
>> >> different bugreports and thought I've sent you a patch to test
>> >> already. Anyway, please test
>> >>
>> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1728111/
>> >
>> >
Hi Daniel,
> My apologies for the long delay in answering, I've somehow mixed up
> different bugreports and thought I've sent you a patch to test
> already. Anyway, please test
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1728111/
Tested-by: Henrik Rydberg
Thanks,
Henrik
Hi Daniel,
> >> My apologies for the long delay in answering, I've somehow mixed up
> >> different bugreports and thought I've sent you a patch to test
> >> already. Anyway, please test
> >>
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1728111/
> >
> > Tested-by: Henrik Rydberg
>
> Can you please
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> My apologies for the long delay in answering, I've somehow mixed up
>> different bugreports and thought I've sent you a patch to test
>> already. Anyway, please test
>>
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1728111/
>
> Tested-by: Henr
Hi Daniel,
> > As advertised, this patch breaks the Macbook Pro Retina, which seems
> > unfair. The patch below is certainly not the best remedy, but it does
> > work. Tested on a MacbookPro10,1.
>
> My apologies for the long delay in answering, I've somehow mixed up
> different bugreports and th
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> drm/i915: do not ignore eDP bpc settings from vbt
>
> As advertised, this patch breaks the Macbook Pro Retina, which seems
> unfair. The patch below is certainly not the best remedy, but it does
> work. Tested on a MacbookPro10,1.
M
Hi Daniel,
> > As advertised, this patch breaks the Macbook Pro Retina, which seems
> > unfair. The patch below is certainly not the best remedy, but it does
> > work. Tested on a MacbookPro10,1.
>
> My apologies for the long delay in answering, I've somehow mixed up
> different bugreports and th
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> drm/i915: do not ignore eDP bpc settings from vbt
>
> As advertised, this patch breaks the Macbook Pro Retina, which seems
> unfair. The patch below is certainly not the best remedy, but it does
> work. Tested on a MacbookPro10,1.
M
> drm/i915: do not ignore eDP bpc settings from vbt
As advertised, this patch breaks the Macbook Pro Retina, which seems
unfair. The patch below is certainly not the best remedy, but it does
work. Tested on a MacbookPro10,1.
Thanks,
Henrik
---
From: Henrik Rydberg
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012
> drm/i915: do not ignore eDP bpc settings from vbt
As advertised, this patch breaks the Macbook Pro Retina, which seems
unfair. The patch below is certainly not the best remedy, but it does
work. Tested on a MacbookPro10,1.
Thanks,
Henrik
---
From: Henrik Rydberg
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012
18 matches
Mail list logo
