Hi,
On 4/30/20 3:22 AM, David Santamaría Rogado wrote:
I'm thinking also about the i915 part. Could be something different
that Intel does in the Windows version of their driver? Seem very
strange that Microsoft could patch something because of this
particular hardwares.
On Windows devices oft
Hi Hans,
I also found something interesting with that tests, the bgrt is not
painted in the same position when doing the EFI Shell rotation, the
firmware seems to take into account to position it. That solved me one
thing I could not understand, Windows recovery system uses the
incorrect orientati
I'm thinking also about the i915 part. Could be something different
that Intel does in the Windows version of their driver? Seem very
strange that Microsoft could patch something because of this
particular hardwares.
El mar., 28 abr. 2020 a las 10:45, Hans de Goede
() escribió:
>
> Hi David,
>
> O
Anyway, what you say is what I thought, goo video mode is not being
modified by the kernel, but, the problem is that we take then the first
available mode we can found, so the problem is we take, in devices where
the default video mode is not the first one in order, the wrong mode. So
efifb is thin
This is related to the issues at least on some devices for panel
orientation quirks where added.
My tests have been done over a Lenovo ideapad D330.
This devices like the other ones that need panel orientation quirks,
shows the initramfs with wrong stride and x and y swapped. By applying
the pane
Hi David,
On 4/28/20 1:58 AM, David Santamaría Rogado wrote:
This is related to the issues at least on some devices for panel
orientation quirks where added.
Thank you for looking into this.
My tests have been done over a Lenovo ideapad D330.
This devices like the other ones that need panel
