Wasn't there a driver for qemu cirrus "hardware"?
Sending from a mobile, pardon my terseness. ~ C.
On Sep 15, 2011 1:05 PM, "Alex Deucher" wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 19:52, Alex Deucher
wrote:
>>> While the DRM has historical
Sending from a mobile, pardon my terseness. ~ C.
On Sep 15, 2011 1:05 PM, "Alex Deucher" wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 19:52, Alex Deucher
wrote:
>>> While the DRM has historically targeted 3D acceleration, that is not a
>>> requ
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 19:52, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> While the DRM has historically targeted 3D acceleration, that is not a
>> requirement to use the DRM KMS modesetting API. The current fb API
>> has no concept of display controllers
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 19:52, Alex Deucher wrote:
> While the DRM has historically targeted 3D acceleration, that is not a
> requirement to use the DRM KMS modesetting API. The current fb API
> has no concept of display controllers or connectors or overlays, etc.
> To match it to modern hardware
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Florian Tobias Schandinat
wrote:
> On 09/15/2011 03:50 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:29:54 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen
>> wrote:
>>
>>> 1) It's part of DRM, so it doesn't help fb or v4l2 drivers. Except if
>>> the plan is to make DRM the core Linux
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:29:54 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen
wrote:
> 1) It's part of DRM, so it doesn't help fb or v4l2 drivers. Except if
> the plan is to make DRM the core Linux display framework, upon which
> everything else is built, and fb and v4l2 are changed to use DRM.
I'd like to think we could
Hi Alan,
On 09/15/2011 05:18 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> is and we could use it. Such attitude is not helpful and as I don't see any
>> serious intention of the DRM guys to cooperate I think those subsystems are
>> more
>> likely to diverge. At least I'll never accept any change to the fb
>> infrastru
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:50 -0500, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:29:54 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen
> wrote:
>
> > 1) It's part of DRM, so it doesn't help fb or v4l2 drivers. Except if
> > the plan is to make DRM the core Linux display framework, upon which
> > everything else is built,
> is and we could use it. Such attitude is not helpful and as I don't see any
> serious intention of the DRM guys to cooperate I think those subsystems are
> more
> likely to diverge. At least I'll never accept any change to the fb
> infrastructure that requires DRM.
There are aspects of the fb c
On 09/15/2011 03:50 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:29:54 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen
> wrote:
>
>> 1) It's part of DRM, so it doesn't help fb or v4l2 drivers. Except if
>> the plan is to make DRM the core Linux display framework, upon which
>> everything else is built, and fb and v4
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:50:32 -0500
Keith Packard wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:29:54 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen
> wrote:
>
> > 1) It's part of DRM, so it doesn't help fb or v4l2 drivers. Except if
> > the plan is to make DRM the core Linux display framework, upon which
> > everything else is buil
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:07:05 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen
wrote:
> This was a very rough and quite short proposal, but I'm happy to improve
> and extend it if it's not totally shot down.
Jesse Barnes has put together a proposal much like this to work within
the existing DRM environment. This is pretty
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:29:54 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen
wrote:
> 1) It's part of DRM, so it doesn't help fb or v4l2 drivers. Except if
> the plan is to make DRM the core Linux display framework, upon which
> everything else is built, and fb and v4l2 are changed to use DRM.
I'd like to think we could
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 09:59 -0500, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:07:05 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen
> wrote:
>
> > This was a very rough and quite short proposal, but I'm happy to improve
> > and extend it if it's not totally shot down.
>
> Jesse Barnes has put together a proposal much
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:07:05 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen
wrote:
> This was a very rough and quite short proposal, but I'm happy to improve
> and extend it if it's not totally shot down.
Jesse Barnes has put together a proposal much like this to work within
the existing DRM environment. This is pretty
Hi,
I am the author of OMAP display driver, and while developing it I've
often felt that there's something missing in Linux's display area. I've
been planning to write a post about this for a few years already, but I
never got to it. So here goes at last!
---
First I want to (try to) describe sh
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
