Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/msm/disp/dpu1: allow reservation even if dspps are not available.

2023-01-17 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
-ker...@vger.kernel.org; robdcl...@chromium.org; diand...@chromium.org; swb...@chromium.org; Vinod Polimera (QUIC) ; Abhinav Kumar (QUIC) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/msm/disp/dpu1: allow reservation even if dspps are not available. WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please

RE: [PATCH 1/3] drm/msm/disp/dpu1: allow reservation even if dspps are not available.

2023-01-17 Thread Kalyan Thota
er.kernel.org; robdcl...@chromium.org; >diand...@chromium.org; swb...@chromium.org; Vinod Polimera (QUIC) >; Abhinav Kumar (QUIC) > >Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/msm/disp/dpu1: allow reservation even if dspps are >not available. > >WARNING: This email originated from outside of

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/msm/disp/dpu1: allow reservation even if dspps are not available.

2023-01-17 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On 17/01/2023 18:35, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: On 17/01/2023 18:21, Kalyan Thota wrote: if any topology requests for dspps and catalogue doesn't have the allocation, avoid failing the reservation. This can pave way to build logic allowing composer fallbacks for all the color features that are han

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/msm/disp/dpu1: allow reservation even if dspps are not available.

2023-01-17 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On 17/01/2023 18:21, Kalyan Thota wrote: if any topology requests for dspps and catalogue doesn't have the allocation, avoid failing the reservation. This can pave way to build logic allowing composer fallbacks for all the color features that are handled in dspp. Signed-off-by: Kalyan Thota --