RE: [v2 1/3] dt-bindings: msm/dsi: Add 10nm dsi phy tuning properties

2022-01-12 Thread Rajeev Nandan
Hi Dmitry, Rob, Thanks for the review. > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 05:06:03PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 at 15:56, Rajeev Nandan > wrote: > > > > > > In most cases, the default values of DSI PHY tuning registers should > > > be sufficient as they are fully optimized.

Re: [v2 1/3] dt-bindings: msm/dsi: Add 10nm dsi phy tuning properties

2022-01-10 Thread Rob Herring
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 05:06:03PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 at 15:56, Rajeev Nandan wrote: > > > > In most cases, the default values of DSI PHY tuning registers should be > > sufficient as they are fully optimized. However, in some cases where > > extreme board

Re: [v2 1/3] dt-bindings: msm/dsi: Add 10nm dsi phy tuning properties

2022-01-10 Thread Rob Herring
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 18:25:35 +0530, Rajeev Nandan wrote: > In most cases, the default values of DSI PHY tuning registers should be > sufficient as they are fully optimized. However, in some cases where > extreme board parasitics cause the eye shape to degrade, the override > bits can be used to

Re: [v2 1/3] dt-bindings: msm/dsi: Add 10nm dsi phy tuning properties

2022-01-10 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 at 15:56, Rajeev Nandan wrote: > > In most cases, the default values of DSI PHY tuning registers should be > sufficient as they are fully optimized. However, in some cases where > extreme board parasitics cause the eye shape to degrade, the override > bits can be used to