On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:37 AM Koenig, Christian
wrote:
>
> Am 20.03.19 um 05:34 schrieb Nathan Chancellor:
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 01:31:27AM +, Pan, Xinhui wrote:
> >> these two enumerated types are same for now. both of them might change in
> >> the future.
Please consider if the YAG
Resending as plain-text to rest of list.
Steve
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:58 AM Stephen Hines wrote:
>
> Why are there 2 different enums for this same thing at all? By casting, you
> are reducing type safety in the kernel, which can cause bugs later (should
> the two enums diverge in encoding).
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 07:58:09AM -0700, Stephen Hines wrote:
> Why are there 2 different enums for this same thing at all? By casting, you
> are reducing type safety in the kernel, which can cause bugs later (should
> the two enums diverge in encoding). In my opinion, the proper solution is
> to
Why are there 2 different enums for this same thing at all? By casting, you
are reducing type safety in the kernel, which can cause bugs later (should
the two enums diverge in encoding). In my opinion, the proper solution is
to remove one of the enums or provide an explicit helper that does the
con
@lists.freedesktop.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
clang-built-li...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Clang warning in drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 07:58:09AM -0700, Stephen Hines wrote:
> Why are there 2 different enums for this same thing at all? By
> casting, y
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 4:49 PM Nick Desaulniers
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:37 AM Koenig, Christian
> wrote:
> >
> > Am 20.03.19 um 05:34 schrieb Nathan Chancellor:
> > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 01:31:27AM +, Pan, Xinhui wrote:
> > >> these two enumerated types are same for now. bot
Am 20.03.19 um 05:34 schrieb Nathan Chancellor:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 01:31:27AM +, Pan, Xinhui wrote:
>> these two enumerated types are same for now. both of them might change in
>> the future.
>>
>> I have not used clang, but would .block_id = (int)head->block fix your
>> warning? If
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 01:31:27AM +, Pan, Xinhui wrote:
> these two enumerated types are same for now. both of them might change in the
> future.
>
> I have not used clang, but would .block_id = (int)head->block fix your
> warning? If such change is acceptable, I can make one then.
>
> T
these two enumerated types are same for now. both of them might change in the
future.
I have not used clang, but would .block_id = (int)head->block fix your
warning? If such change is acceptable, I can make one then.
Thanks
xinhui
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Chancellor
Sent: 2
