Re: WTF: patch "[PATCH] drm/mgag200: Remove declaration of mgag200_mmap() from header" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 5.8-stable tree?

2020-08-11 Thread Vivi, Rodrigo
> On Aug 10, 2020, at 5:49 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 05:24:53PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 1:28 PM Greg KH wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 01:02:34PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 12:24 PM Greg KH wrote:

Re: WTF: patch "[PATCH] drm/mgag200: Remove declaration of mgag200_mmap() from header" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 5.8-stable tree?

2020-08-10 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 05:24:53PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 1:28 PM Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 01:02:34PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 12:24 PM Greg KH > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 11:13:54AM +020

Re: WTF: patch "[PATCH] drm/mgag200: Remove declaration of mgag200_mmap() from header" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 5.8-stable tree?

2020-08-10 Thread Jani Nikula
On Sat, 08 Aug 2020, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Hi Daniel. > > On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 11:13:54AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 3:54 PM Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >> > >> > Hi >> > >> > Am 07.08.20 um 15:30 schrieb gre...@linuxfoundation.org: >> > > The patch below was submitted

Re: WTF: patch "[PATCH] drm/mgag200: Remove declaration of mgag200_mmap() from header" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 5.8-stable tree?

2020-08-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 1:28 PM Greg KH wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 01:02:34PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 12:24 PM Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 11:13:54AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 3:54 PM Thomas Zimmermann

Re: WTF: patch "[PATCH] drm/mgag200: Remove declaration of mgag200_mmap() from header" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 5.8-stable tree?

2020-08-08 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 01:02:34PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 12:24 PM Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 11:13:54AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 3:54 PM Thomas Zimmermann > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > Am 07.08.2

Re: WTF: patch "[PATCH] drm/mgag200: Remove declaration of mgag200_mmap() from header" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 5.8-stable tree?

2020-08-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 12:24 PM Greg KH wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 11:13:54AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 3:54 PM Thomas Zimmermann > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > Am 07.08.20 um 15:30 schrieb gre...@linuxfoundation.org: > > > > The patch below was submit

Re: WTF: patch "[PATCH] drm/mgag200: Remove declaration of mgag200_mmap() from header" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 5.8-stable tree?

2020-08-08 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 11:13:54AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 3:54 PM Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > Am 07.08.20 um 15:30 schrieb gre...@linuxfoundation.org: > > > The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 5.8-stable tree. > > > > > > I fail to see h

Re: WTF: patch "[PATCH] drm/mgag200: Remove declaration of mgag200_mmap() from header" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 5.8-stable tree?

2020-08-08 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Daniel. On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 11:13:54AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 3:54 PM Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > Am 07.08.20 um 15:30 schrieb gre...@linuxfoundation.org: > > > The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 5.8-stable tree. > > > > > > I f

Re: WTF: patch "[PATCH] drm/mgag200: Remove declaration of mgag200_mmap() from header" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 5.8-stable tree?

2020-08-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 3:54 PM Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > Hi > > Am 07.08.20 um 15:30 schrieb gre...@linuxfoundation.org: > > The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 5.8-stable tree. > > > > I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at > > Documentation/proce