On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:14:20PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 09:49:58PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> > Hi, Chris,
> >
> > With your new (well sort of) implementation of drm_read() it looks to me
> > like a drm_read() to a paged out
>
Hi!
On 11/24/2015 11:14 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 09:49:58PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>> Hi, Chris,
>>
>> With your new (well sort of) implementation of drm_read() it looks to me
>> like a drm_read() to a paged out
>> memory area wi
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 09:49:58PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> Hi, Chris,
>
> With your new (well sort of) implementation of drm_read() it looks to me
> like a drm_read() to a paged out
> memory area will always fail with -EFAULT. From what I can tell, there's
> nothing
