endianness of rlc buffers (SI)

2013-10-22 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote: >>> commit 555b1b651acf44bf27ebbb04235d38a8fd2d58dc (drm-fixes-3.12) >>> >>> evergreen.c, SI code path, line 4045 and 4046 shouldn't be swapped? >>> Should cpu_to_le32 be used? >>> >>> Basically, is the endianness enforcement right for the r

endianness of rlc buffers (SI)

2013-10-22 Thread Sylvain BERTRAND
>> commit 555b1b651acf44bf27ebbb04235d38a8fd2d58dc (drm-fixes-3.12) >> >> evergreen.c, SI code path, line 4045 and 4046 shouldn't be swapped? >> Should cpu_to_le32 be used? >> >> Basically, is the endianness enforcement right for the rlc BOs? >> Or is there a bit somewhere to switch the RLC to host

endianness of rlc buffers (SI)

2013-10-22 Thread Sylvain BERTRAND
Hi, commit 555b1b651acf44bf27ebbb04235d38a8fd2d58dc (drm-fixes-3.12) evergreen.c, SI code path, line 4045 and 4046 shouldn't be swapped? Should cpu_to_le32 be used? Basically, is the endianness enforcement right for the rlc BOs? Or is there a bit somewhere to switch the RLC to host endianness? O

endianness of rlc buffers (SI)

2013-10-22 Thread Alex Deucher
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote: > Hi, > > commit 555b1b651acf44bf27ebbb04235d38a8fd2d58dc (drm-fixes-3.12) > > evergreen.c, SI code path, line 4045 and 4046 shouldn't be swapped? > Should cpu_to_le32 be used? > > Basically, is the endianness enforcement right for the rlc B