On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
>>> commit 555b1b651acf44bf27ebbb04235d38a8fd2d58dc (drm-fixes-3.12)
>>>
>>> evergreen.c, SI code path, line 4045 and 4046 shouldn't be swapped?
>>> Should cpu_to_le32 be used?
>>>
>>> Basically, is the endianness enforcement right for the r
>> commit 555b1b651acf44bf27ebbb04235d38a8fd2d58dc (drm-fixes-3.12)
>>
>> evergreen.c, SI code path, line 4045 and 4046 shouldn't be swapped?
>> Should cpu_to_le32 be used?
>>
>> Basically, is the endianness enforcement right for the rlc BOs?
>> Or is there a bit somewhere to switch the RLC to host
Hi,
commit 555b1b651acf44bf27ebbb04235d38a8fd2d58dc (drm-fixes-3.12)
evergreen.c, SI code path, line 4045 and 4046 shouldn't be swapped?
Should cpu_to_le32 be used?
Basically, is the endianness enforcement right for the rlc BOs?
Or is there a bit somewhere to switch the RLC to host
endianness? O
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> Hi,
>
> commit 555b1b651acf44bf27ebbb04235d38a8fd2d58dc (drm-fixes-3.12)
>
> evergreen.c, SI code path, line 4045 and 4046 shouldn't be swapped?
> Should cpu_to_le32 be used?
>
> Basically, is the endianness enforcement right for the rlc B