On Thu, 16 Mar 2023, Dave Airlie wrote:
> Hey moduly/firmware people,
>
> We are facing a problem in the future of NVIDIA providing giant
> firmwares for their devices that are version locked with unstable
> APIs. Even if they weren't version locked we'd likely have to support
> multiple major
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 07:18:11AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> MODULE_FIRMWARE_GROUP("g1")
> MODULE_FIRMWARE("fwv1.bin")
> MODULE_FIRMWARE("fwv2.bin")
> MODULE_FIRMWARE_GROUP_END("g2")
The way module namespaces were implemented could be used to leverage
something like this, just that you'd use it
On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 06:56, Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 4:35 PM Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> > Hey moduly/firmware people,
> >
> > We are facing a problem in the future of NVIDIA providing giant
> > firmwares for their devices that are version locked with unstable
> > APIs.
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 4:35 PM Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> Hey moduly/firmware people,
>
> We are facing a problem in the future of NVIDIA providing giant
> firmwares for their devices that are version locked with unstable
> APIs. Even if they weren't version locked we'd likely have to support
>
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 1:35 PM Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> Hey moduly/firmware people,
>
> We are facing a problem in the future of NVIDIA providing giant
> firmwares for their devices that are version locked with unstable
> APIs. Even if they weren't version locked we'd likely have to support
>
Hey moduly/firmware people,
We are facing a problem in the future of NVIDIA providing giant
firmwares for their devices that are version locked with unstable
APIs. Even if they weren't version locked we'd likely have to support
multiple major versions over time.
Now this becomes a problem
