On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> Davidlohr pointed to this patch (tested the triplet):
>
> ipc, sem: do not call sem_lock when bogus sma:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/31/12
>
> Is that what you mean?
Yup.
Linus
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> See attached dmesg.
This still has the bug Davidlohr pointed at:
>> This looks like what Emmanuel was/is running into:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/30/1
you need to move the "IS_ERR()" check before the sem_lock.
Linus
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> I have applied all three patches and see still call-traces.
> New are apparmor related messages.
Can you try the crazy rcu double-free debug hack?
See
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/30/113
and I'm re-attaching the ugly-ass crazy hack
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
I have applied all three patches and see still call-traces.
New are apparmor related messages.
Can you try the crazy rcu double-free debug hack?
See
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/30/113
and I'm re-attaching the
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
See attached dmesg.
This still has the bug Davidlohr pointed at:
This looks like what Emmanuel was/is running into:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/30/1
you need to move the IS_ERR() check before the sem_lock.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20130417:
>>
>> New Trees: rpmsg (actually added yesterday)
>> ppc-temp (replacing powerpc for this week)
>>
>> The ceph tree
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130417:
New Trees: rpmsg (actually added yesterday)
ppc-temp (replacing powerpc for this
