On 2025-09-12 02:47, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
On Thu, 4 Sep 2025 07:59:23 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
On Wed, 03 Sep 2025 15:51:03 + Kaustabh Chakraborty
wrote:
>
> This commit is from commit [1] of branch [2]. However, the macro is
> defined in commit [3] of branch [4]. I ha
Hi all,
On Thu, 4 Sep 2025 07:59:23 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 03 Sep 2025 15:51:03 + Kaustabh Chakraborty
> wrote:
> >
> > This commit is from commit [1] of branch [2]. However, the macro is
> > defined in commit [3] of branch [4]. I had sent those patches in a single
> > p
Hi Kaustabh,
On Wed, 03 Sep 2025 15:51:03 + Kaustabh Chakraborty
wrote:
>
> This commit is from commit [1] of branch [2]. However, the macro is
> defined in commit [3] of branch [4]. I had sent those patches in a single
> patchset, though.
>
> I guess the merge strategy would be exynos-drm-
On 2025-09-02 03:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
On Mon, 1 Sep 2025 12:22:26 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 12:13:20 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2025 11:27:40 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-exynos tree, today's lin
Hi all,
On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 12:13:20 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2025 11:27:40 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-exynos tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.
Hi all,
On Mon, 1 Sep 2025 12:22:26 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 12:13:20 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 21 Aug 2025 11:27:40 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the drm-exynos tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > > multi
On Fri Aug 29, 2025 at 4:23 AM CEST, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_exec_test.c: In function 'test_prepare_array':
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_exec_test.c:171:1:
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_exec_test.c: In function 'test_prepare_array':
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_exec_test.c:171:1: error: the frame size of 2136
bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=f
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/megachips-stdp-ge-b850v3-fw.c: In function
'ge_b850v3_lvds_detect':
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/megachips-stdp-ge-b850v3-fw.c:145:16: error: too few
arguments to f
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 28. Mai 2025, 09:17:13 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Damon
Ding:
> On 2025/5/28 11:42, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/anal
Hi Stephen,
On 2025/5/28 11:42, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c: In function
'analogix_dp_probe':
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c: In function
'analogix_dp_probe':
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c:1589:17: error: label
'err_disable_clk' used but n
Hi all,
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 13:30:13 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:3118:
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c: In function 'ccs_test_migrate':
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:3118:
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c: In function 'ccs_test_migrate':
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c:63:15: error: too many argum
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:3118:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c: In function 'ccs_test_migrate':
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c:63:15: error: too many arguments to functi
Hi all,
On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 12:58:03 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-xe tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpusvm.c: In function 'drm_gpusvm_range_get_pages':
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpusvm.c:1404:44: error: 'str
Hi Stephen,
On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 13:21:12 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-xe tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:22,
> from include/linux/cpumask.h:11,
>
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
scripts/Makefile.build:41: drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/Makefile: No such file or
directory
make[7]: *** No rule to make target 'drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/Makefile'. Stop.
Presuably caused by commit
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/linux/module.h:22,
from include/linux/device/driver.h:21,
from include/linux/device.h:32,
from include/linux/d
Hi all,
After merging the drm-xe tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c: In function 'xe_display_pm_shutdown':
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c:382:27: error: passing argument 1 of
'intel_dmc_suspend' from incompatibl
On Wed, Sep 4, 2024, 11:58 Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Sep 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tdp158.c: In function 'tdp158_enable':
> > driv
On Wed, 04 Sep 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tdp158.c: In function 'tdp158_enable':
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tdp158.c:31:9: error: implicit declaration
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tdp158.c: In function 'tdp158_enable':
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tdp158.c:31:9: error: implicit declaration of
function 'gpiod_set_value_cansleep' [-Wimplicit-funct
Hi all,
After merging the drm-intel tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c:2118:6: error: redefinition of
'intel_dp_mst_verify_dpcd_state'
2118 | bool intel_dp_mst_verify_dpcd_state(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
|
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 12:28 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 10:19:01 -0700 Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 07:13:19PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > > allyesconfi
Hi all,
On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 10:19:01 -0700 Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 07:13:19PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > In file included from arch/powerpc/include/a
Hi
On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 13:46 +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> + Rodrigo for help
>
> On 03.07.2024 04:36, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 18:03:39 +0100 Mark Brown
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > allmod
+ Rodrigo for help
On 03.07.2024 04:36, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 18:03:39 +0100 Mark Brown wrote:
>>
>> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> /tmp/next/build/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.
Hi all,
On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 18:03:39 +0100 Mark Brown wrote:
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> /tmp/next/build/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c: In function
> 'pf_get_threshold':
> /tmp/next/build/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 07:13:19PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu.h:144,
> from arch/powerpc/include/asm/paca.h:18,
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu.h:144,
from arch/powerpc/include/asm/paca.h:18,
from arch/powerpc/include/asm/current.h:13,
f
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 07:58:23PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> On 28.06.2024 19:03, Mark Brown wrote:
> > /tmp/next/build/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c: In function
> > 'pf_get_threshold':
> > /tmp/next/build/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c:1788:27: error:
> > unused
On 28.06.2024 19:03, Mark Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> /tmp/next/build/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c: In function
> 'pf_get_threshold':
> /tmp/next/build/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_srio
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
/tmp/next/build/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c: In function
'pf_get_threshold':
/tmp/next/build/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c:1788:27: error:
unused variable 'xe' [-Werr
On Fri, 28 Jun 2024, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 at 05:26, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 02:12:39PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > After merging the drm-intel tree, today's linux-next build (i386
>> > defconfig) failed like this:
>> >
>> > x
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 at 05:26, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 02:12:39PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the drm-intel tree, today's linux-next build (i386
> > defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/in
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 02:12:39PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-intel tree, today's linux-next build (i386
> defconfig) failed like this:
>
> x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.o: in function
> `intel_vrr_compute_config':
> intel_vrr
Hi all,
After merging the drm-intel tree, today's linux-next build (i386
defconfig) failed like this:
x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.o: in function
`intel_vrr_compute_config':
intel_vrr.c:(.text+0x4e4): undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
Caused by commit
1676ecd3
Hi,
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 12:35:31PM GMT, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_enc.c: In function
> 'sun4i_hdmi_connector_mode_valid':
> drivers/gpu/drm
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_enc.c: In function
'sun4i_hdmi_connector_mode_valid':
drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_enc.c:213:17: error: implicit declaration of
function 'drm_connect
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_drv.h:14,
from drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_bo.c:26:
drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_performance_counters.h:118:43: warning:
'v3d_v42_per
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build
(x86_64_allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_fw.c:19:
drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_fw.c: In function 'panthor_job_irq_suspend':
drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h:326:13: er
Am 25.02.24 um 22:47 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
Hi all,
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 08:41:16 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:48:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:15:54 +0200 Jani Nikula
wrote:
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
After merging
Hi all,
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 08:41:16 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:48:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:15:54 +0200 Jani Nikula
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 06 Feb 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > After mergin
Hi all,
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:48:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:15:54 +0200 Jani Nikula
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 06 Feb 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
> > > failed like this:
Hi Geert,
Thanks for the feedback.
> -Original Message-
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 8:29 AM
> Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
>
> Hi Biju,
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 9
Hi Maxime Ripard,
> -Original Message-
> From: Maxime Ripard
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 8:32 AM
> To: Biju Das
> Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
>
> Hi Biju,
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 08:14
Hi Biju,
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 08:14:14AM +, Biju Das wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stephen Rothwell
> > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 1:46 AM
> > Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
> >
> > Hi all,
Hi Biju,
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 9:14 AM Biju Das wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stephen Rothwell
> > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 1:46 AM
> > Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
> >
> > After merging t
Hi All,
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 1:46 AM
> Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rz-du/rzg2l_du_vsp.c:47:6: error: redefinition of
'rzg2l_du_vsp_enable'
47 | void rzg2l_du_vsp_enable(struct rzg2l_du_crtc *crtc)
| ^~~
Hi all,
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:15:54 +0200 Jani Nikula
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 06 Feb 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > In function 'i915_ttm_placement_from_obj',
> > inlined from 'i915_t
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c: In function 'simple_error_capture':
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c:814:48: error: passing argument 1 of
'drm_err_printer' from incompatible pointer ty
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> In function 'i915_ttm_placement_from_obj',
> inlined from 'i915_ttm_get_pages' at
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c:847:2:
> dr
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c: In function 'drm_test_mm_debug':
>> drivers/gpu/d
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c: In function 'drm_test_mm_debug':
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c:191:32: error: implicit dec
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c: In function 'drm_test_mm_debug':
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c:191:32: error: implicit declaration of
function 'drm_debug_printer'; did you mean 'd
Hi all,
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 15:28:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> In function 'i915_ttm_placement_from_obj',
> inlined from 'i915_ttm_get_pages' at
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm
On Wed, 07 Feb 2024, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Indeed. Not even drm-misc itself compiles with xe enabled. I'll ping
> drm-misc maintainers.
We'll need CONFIG_DRM_XE=m enabled in drm-rerere/drm-misc-*_defconfig,
and get people to use that.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 14:21 -0600, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 01:39:28PM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:28 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > >
Hi all,
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 12:28:22 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:41:10: error: 'struct ttm_placement' has no member
named 'num_busy_placement'; did you mean 'num_
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 01:39:28PM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
Hi
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:28 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
Caused by commit
a78a8da51b36 ("drm/ttm: replace busy p
Hi
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:28 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
>
> Caused by commit
>
> a78a8da51b36 ("drm/ttm: replace busy placement with flags v6")
>
> interacting with comm
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
>
> Caused by commit
>
> a78a8da51b36 ("drm/ttm: replace busy placement with flags v6")
>
> interacting with commit
>
> dd08ebf6c352
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
failed like this:
In function 'i915_ttm_placement_from_obj',
inlined from 'i915_ttm_get_pages' at
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c:847:2:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c:165:18: error: 'places[0
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
Caused by commit
a78a8da51b36 ("drm/ttm: replace busy placement with flags v6")
interacting with commit
dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
(and maybe
Hi all,
After merging the drm-msm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_seq64.c: In function 'amdgpu_seq64_map':
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_seq64.c:64:9: error: too few arguments to
function 'drm_exec_init'
64 |
On Monday, November 27, 2023 5:32 AM, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR: modpost: "device_is_dependent"
> [drivers/gpu/drm/drm_kms_helper.ko] undefined!
I've sent a new patch
On 2023-11-26 18:38, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c:21:41: error:
> 'DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_MIN' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean
>
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c:21:41: error: 'DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_MIN'
undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_LOW'?
21 | NOUVEAU_SCHED_PRIOR
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: modpost: "device_is_dependent" [drivers/gpu/drm/drm_kms_helper.ko]
undefined!
Caused by commit
39d5b6a64ace ("drm/bridge: panel: Check device dependency before managing
dev
Hi all,
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 12:27:49 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 12:22:09 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/displayport.c: I
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 12:27:49PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 12:22:09 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/displaypo
Hi all,
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 12:22:09 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/displayport.c: In function 'dp_altmode_vdm':
> drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/displayport.c:309:3
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/displayport.c: In function 'dp_altmode_vdm':
drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/displayport.c:309:33: error: too few arguments to
function 'drm_connector_oob_hotplug_event
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c: In function
'nouveau_dmem_migrate_chunk':
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c:681:43: error: 'chunk' undeclared (first
use in this function)
681
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/linux/build_bug.h:5,
from include/linux/init.h:5,
from include/linux/io.h:10,
from include/linux/iosys-m
Thorsten Leemhuis writes:
> Lo!
>
> Sometimes the regression tracker runs into regressions himself... :-D
>
> On 11.04.23 08:47, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>
>> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c:73:
Lo!
Sometimes the regression tracker runs into regressions himself... :-D
On 11.04.23 08:47, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c:73:29: error: variably modified
> 'global_
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c:73:29: error: variably modified
'global_write_combined' at file scope
73 | static struct ttm_pool_type global_write_combined[TTM_DIM_ORDER];
|
Hi Qiang,
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 16:51:27 +0800 Qiang Yu wrote:
>
> I think you can just revert the following three lima commits when merge:
> * 4a66f3da99dc ("drm/lima: add show_fdinfo for drm usage stats")
> * 87767de835ed ("drm/lima: allocate unique id per drm_file")
> * bccafec957a5 ("drm/lima: a
I think you can just revert the following three lima commits when merge:
* 4a66f3da99dc ("drm/lima: add show_fdinfo for drm usage stats")
* 87767de835ed ("drm/lima: allocate unique id per drm_file")
* bccafec957a5 ("drm/lima: add usage counting method to ctx_mgr")
Regards,
Qiang
On Mon, Apr 3, 20
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_ctx.c: In function 'lima_ctx_do_release':
drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_ctx.c:53:45: error: 'struct drm_sched_entity' has no
member named 'elapsed_ns'
53 |
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 01:12:22PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c:33:
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c: In function 'drm_fb_helpe
Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c:33:
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c: In function 'drm_fb_helper_single_fb_probe':
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c:1968:24: error: 'dev' undecl
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_bo.c: In function 'vc4_create_object':
drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_bo.c:398:13: warning: unused variable 'ret'
[-Wunused-variable]
398 | int ret;
|
Hi
Am 23.11.22 um 06:35 schrieb David Airlie:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 3:21 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 18:32:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
ld: drivers/vid
Hi Dave,
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 15:35:50 +1000 David Airlie wrote:
>
> Nothing gone wrong as such, just the drm-misc-next pull request was
> sent on a regular weekly cadence, then I merged it a few days later.
> The fix for this is still in the drm-misc-next queue for the next PR
> which I will get
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 3:21 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 18:32:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > ld: drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmon.o: in
Hi all,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 18:32:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> ld: drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmon.o: in function `fb_modesetting_disabled':
> fbmon.c:(.text+0x1e4): multiple defi
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
ld: drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmon.o: in function `fb_modesetting_disabled':
fbmon.c:(.text+0x1e4): multiple definition of `fb_modesetting_disabled';
drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.o:fb
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.o
Caused by commit
44a3928324e9 ("drm/tests: Add Kunit Helpers")
I have used the drm-misc tree from n
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c: In function 'nouveau_drm_probe':
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c:797:17: error: implicit declaration of
function 'drm_fbdev_generic_setup' [-W
On Fri, 2022-10-21 at 11:02 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c: In function
> 'nouveau_display_create':
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_di
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c: In function 'nouveau_display_create':
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c:662:29: error: unused variable
'device' [-Werror=unused-variable]
Hi Alex,
On Thu, 6 Oct 2022 09:56:32 -0400 Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> This looks good to me. Care to add you s-o-b?
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 4:12 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > This works as well, and (in my opinion) is better:
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_str
On 2022-10-06 04:12, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
On Thu, 6 Oct 2022 09:28:10 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
I have applied the following hack for today:
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 09:14:26 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] fix up for drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_stream.
This looks good to me. Care to add you s-o-b?
Alex
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 4:12 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 6 Oct 2022 09:28:10 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > I have applied the following hack for today:
> >
> > From: Stephen Rothwell
> > Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022
Hi all,
On Thu, 6 Oct 2022 09:28:10 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> I have applied the following hack for today:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 09:14:26 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] fix up for drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_stream.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwel
Hi all,
On Wed, 5 Oct 2022 12:45:31 -0400 Hamza Mahfooz wrote:
>
> On 2022-10-05 11:30, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > @Mahfooz, Hamza
> > @Aurabindo Pillai can you get this fixed up?
> >
>
> Seems like this is a false positive for GCC versions pre-12, because I'm not
> seeing this warning on GCC 1
1 - 100 of 387 matches
Mail list logo
