Re: make alloc_anon_inode more useful

2021-03-09 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 04:53:39PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > this series first renames the existing alloc_anon_inode to > alloc_anon_inode_sb to clearly mark it as requiring a superblock. > > It then adds a new alloc_anon_inode that works on the anon_inode > file system super block, thus

Re: make alloc_anon_inode more useful

2021-03-09 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 04:53:39PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi all, > > this series first renames the existing alloc_anon_inode to > alloc_anon_inode_sb to clearly mark it as requiring a superblock. > > It then adds a new alloc_anon_inode that works on the anon_inode > file system super