Re: some half-baked ttm ideas

2020-09-16 Thread Intel
On 9/16/20 9:22 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 8:50 AM Thomas Hellström (Intel) wrote: On 9/16/20 6:28 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 14:19, Dave Airlie wrote: On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 00:12, Christian König wrote: Hi Dave, I think we should just completel

Re: some half-baked ttm ideas

2020-09-16 Thread Dave Airlie
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 16:58, Christian König wrote: > > Am 16.09.20 um 08:44 schrieb Thomas Hellström (Intel): > > > > On 9/16/20 6:28 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 14:19, Dave Airlie wrote: > >>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 00:12, Christian König > >>> wrote: > Hi Dave, >

Re: some half-baked ttm ideas

2020-09-16 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 8:50 AM Thomas Hellström (Intel) wrote: > > > On 9/16/20 6:28 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 14:19, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 00:12, Christian König > >> wrote: > >>> Hi Dave, > >>> > >>> I think we should just completely nuke ttm_t

Re: some half-baked ttm ideas

2020-09-16 Thread Christian König
Am 16.09.20 um 08:56 schrieb Dave Airlie: On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 16:44, Thomas Hellström (Intel) wrote: On 9/16/20 6:28 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 14:19, Dave Airlie wrote: On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 00:12, Christian König wrote: Hi Dave, I think we should just completely

Re: some half-baked ttm ideas

2020-09-15 Thread Christian König
Am 16.09.20 um 08:44 schrieb Thomas Hellström (Intel): On 9/16/20 6:28 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 14:19, Dave Airlie wrote: On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 00:12, Christian König wrote: Hi Dave, I think we should just completely nuke ttm_tt_bind() and ttm_tt_unbind() and all of

Re: some half-baked ttm ideas

2020-09-15 Thread Dave Airlie
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 16:44, Thomas Hellström (Intel) wrote: > > > On 9/16/20 6:28 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 14:19, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 00:12, Christian König > >> wrote: > >>> Hi Dave, > >>> > >>> I think we should just completely nuke ttm_tt_

Re: some half-baked ttm ideas

2020-09-15 Thread Intel
On 9/16/20 6:28 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 14:19, Dave Airlie wrote: On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 00:12, Christian König wrote: Hi Dave, I think we should just completely nuke ttm_tt_bind() and ttm_tt_unbind() and all of that. Drivers can to this from their move_notify() callb

Re: some half-baked ttm ideas

2020-09-15 Thread Dave Airlie
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 14:19, Dave Airlie wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 00:12, Christian König > wrote: > > > > Hi Dave, > > > > I think we should just completely nuke ttm_tt_bind() and ttm_tt_unbind() > > and all of that. > > > > Drivers can to this from their move_notify() callback now inst

Re: some half-baked ttm ideas

2020-09-15 Thread Dave Airlie
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 00:12, Christian König wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > I think we should just completely nuke ttm_tt_bind() and ttm_tt_unbind() > and all of that. > > Drivers can to this from their move_notify() callback now instead. Good plan, I've put a bunch of rework into the same branch, htt

Re: some half-baked ttm ideas

2020-09-15 Thread Christian König
Hi Dave, I think we should just completely nuke ttm_tt_bind() and ttm_tt_unbind() and all of that. Drivers can to this from their move_notify() callback now instead. Regards, Christian. Am 15.09.20 um 07:30 schrieb Dave Airlie: Hi Christian, I've been trying to move towards the idea of not

some half-baked ttm ideas

2020-09-14 Thread Dave Airlie
Hi Christian, I've been trying to move towards the idea of not having TTM manage the global TT, I'm still not sure what the result would look like so I've been randomly trying out a direction or two, There are some patches in : https://github.com/airlied/linux/commits/ttm-half-baked-ideas a) it