On 9/16/20 9:22 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 8:50 AM Thomas Hellström (Intel)
wrote:
On 9/16/20 6:28 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 14:19, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 00:12, Christian König
wrote:
Hi Dave,
I think we should just completel
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 16:58, Christian König wrote:
>
> Am 16.09.20 um 08:44 schrieb Thomas Hellström (Intel):
> >
> > On 9/16/20 6:28 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 14:19, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 00:12, Christian König
> >>> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 8:50 AM Thomas Hellström (Intel)
wrote:
>
>
> On 9/16/20 6:28 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 14:19, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 00:12, Christian König
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi Dave,
> >>>
> >>> I think we should just completely nuke ttm_t
Am 16.09.20 um 08:56 schrieb Dave Airlie:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 16:44, Thomas Hellström (Intel)
wrote:
On 9/16/20 6:28 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 14:19, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 00:12, Christian König
wrote:
Hi Dave,
I think we should just completely
Am 16.09.20 um 08:44 schrieb Thomas Hellström (Intel):
On 9/16/20 6:28 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 14:19, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 00:12, Christian König
wrote:
Hi Dave,
I think we should just completely nuke ttm_tt_bind() and
ttm_tt_unbind()
and all of
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 16:44, Thomas Hellström (Intel)
wrote:
>
>
> On 9/16/20 6:28 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 14:19, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 00:12, Christian König
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi Dave,
> >>>
> >>> I think we should just completely nuke ttm_tt_
On 9/16/20 6:28 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 14:19, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 00:12, Christian König
wrote:
Hi Dave,
I think we should just completely nuke ttm_tt_bind() and ttm_tt_unbind()
and all of that.
Drivers can to this from their move_notify() callb
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 14:19, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 00:12, Christian König
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > I think we should just completely nuke ttm_tt_bind() and ttm_tt_unbind()
> > and all of that.
> >
> > Drivers can to this from their move_notify() callback now inst
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 00:12, Christian König
wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> I think we should just completely nuke ttm_tt_bind() and ttm_tt_unbind()
> and all of that.
>
> Drivers can to this from their move_notify() callback now instead.
Good plan, I've put a bunch of rework into the same branch,
htt
Hi Dave,
I think we should just completely nuke ttm_tt_bind() and ttm_tt_unbind()
and all of that.
Drivers can to this from their move_notify() callback now instead.
Regards,
Christian.
Am 15.09.20 um 07:30 schrieb Dave Airlie:
Hi Christian,
I've been trying to move towards the idea of not
Hi Christian,
I've been trying to move towards the idea of not having TTM manage the
global TT, I'm still not sure what the result would look like so I've
been randomly trying out a direction or two,
There are some patches in :
https://github.com/airlied/linux/commits/ttm-half-baked-ideas
a) it
11 matches
Mail list logo