Re: [RFT PATCH v2 00/48] drm/panel: Remove most store/double-check of prepared/enabled state

2024-05-08 Thread Doug Anderson
Hi, On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 11:52 PM Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 11:36 PM Douglas Anderson > wrote: > > > As talked about in commit d2aacaf07395 ("drm/panel: Check for already > > prepared/enabled in drm_panel"), we want to remove needless code from > > panel drivers that

Re: [RFT PATCH v2 00/48] drm/panel: Remove most store/double-check of prepared/enabled state

2024-05-06 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Fri, 3 May 2024 14:32:41 -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote: > > As talked about in commit d2aacaf07395 ("drm/panel: Check for already > prepared/enabled in drm_panel"), we want to remove needless code from > panel drivers that was storing and double-checking the > prepared/enabled state. Even if

Re: [RFT PATCH v2 00/48] drm/panel: Remove most store/double-check of prepared/enabled state

2024-05-06 Thread Ondřej Jirman
On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 08:52:39AM GMT, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 11:36 PM Douglas Anderson > wrote: > > > As talked about in commit d2aacaf07395 ("drm/panel: Check for already > > prepared/enabled in drm_panel"), we want to remove needless code from > > panel drivers that

Re: [RFT PATCH v2 00/48] drm/panel: Remove most store/double-check of prepared/enabled state

2024-05-06 Thread Linus Walleij
On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 11:36 PM Douglas Anderson wrote: > As talked about in commit d2aacaf07395 ("drm/panel: Check for already > prepared/enabled in drm_panel"), we want to remove needless code from > panel drivers that was storing and double-checking the > prepared/enabled state. Even if

[RFT PATCH v2 00/48] drm/panel: Remove most store/double-check of prepared/enabled state

2024-05-03 Thread Douglas Anderson
As talked about in commit d2aacaf07395 ("drm/panel: Check for already prepared/enabled in drm_panel"), we want to remove needless code from panel drivers that was storing and double-checking the prepared/enabled state. Even if someone was relying on the double-check before, that double-check is