On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 05:29:29AM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> What about your tdfx GLX context fix?
>
> Nathan's tdfx Xv driver patch?
> Still an issue with 1280x1024x24 (x16?) and above.
>
> Will the mesa-3-5-branch ready for 4.1.0?
No, Mesa 3.5 will not be in the 4.1 releases.
> We need EVERYONE's input from this, so please test as much as you
> can.
What about your tdfx GLX context fix?
Nathan's tdfx Xv driver patch?
Still an issue with 1280x1024x24 (x16?) and above.
Will the mesa-3-5-branch ready for 4.1.0?
Regards,
Dieter
--
Dieter Nützel
Graduate Stud
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 01:02:55AM +0300, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Since I'm not under any NDA and I've started to see some info about this
> card, then I thought to ask this:
>
> Matrox are planning to release Matrox G550 card until the end of this month.
>
> The card, from a techni
Hi All,
Since I'm not under any NDA and I've started to see some info about this
card, then I thought to ask this:
Matrox are planning to release Matrox G550 card until the end of this month.
The card, from a technical point of view will be a continuation of Matrox
G450 - it will have some T&
The V5's _are_ currently supported.
The Voodoo5 SLI work for the DRI was never completed for various reasons,
so it may be cheaper to scrounge up a V4.
On Wed, 9 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Will DRI eventually support all the vodoo cards? I am thinking of
> getting a Vodoo 5500 and I wa
Will DRI eventually support all the vodoo cards? I am thinking of
getting a Vodoo 5500 and I want to be sure that it's going to do all
that i wish..
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 09:31:01PM -0500, Geoff Reedy wrote:
> In the beginning of march they said that they'd be releasing the G450 specs
> "soon", whatever that means. Does anyone know if there are any subtle
> differences between the G400 and the G450?
I can't speak for differences in regis
This is to announce that the daily snapshots will be made in regular
releases at certain points in time.
Due to the XFree86 4.1.0 release coming ever closer we need lots of
testing now to make sure we get as much as possible into 4.1.0.
These regular releases will be put into the SourceForge re
It would seem that Gareth Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> At no time has the Matrox DRI driver used AGP memory for textures.
Can you give us a quick outline of the work required to make this
happen?
cheers,
aaron
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL
"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
>
> On Sun, 6 May 2001, Daryll Strauss wrote:
>
> >> >It depends on what part of the process you want to solve.
> >> >
> >> >For the DRI, the easiest solution would be to have the dri_tdfx.o
> >> >dynamically load the appropriate Glide. The X server knows what hardware
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
