Hi,
I bought a Radeon PCI card and have discovered (I think) that only AGP Radeon
cards are currently supported. Could someone update the Status page so others
don't make this mistake?
I'm going to attempt to add PCI support, though it'll probably take a while to
get over the learning curve. M
Ah, the status page. Possible better ways of doing it have been discussed
many times before, both on and off the list.
Nick Leippe, someone else and me have had quite a lengthy discussion on a
nice way to organize this, including database table layout. If anybody is
interested in what we came
Am Freitag, 15. Juni 2001 13:24 schrieben Sie:
> Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 15. Juni 2001 05:32 schrieb Dieter Nützel:
> > > Am Freitag, 15. Juni 2001 04:30 schrieb John Cavan:
> > > > Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > > > > Hello Alan,
> > > > >
> > > > > I see 4.29 GB under shm with your latest
Andreas Ehliar wrote:
>I'm looking through mga_storm.c and found something which might be a bug.
>In the DRI initialization, pMGADRIServer->textureSize is determined
>by using pMga->FbMapSize.
>Is this correct?
>Shouldn't it be pMga->FbUsableSize instead, since at least the HW cursor is
>located
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 11:50:20AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:46:05 +0200
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> >List-Id:
> >Subject: Card & Motherboard
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:46:05 +0200
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>List-Id:
>Subject: Card & Motherboard / Chipset directory.
>
>How about a directory / database of cards and the mother
I'm looking through mga_storm.c and found something which might be a bug.
In the DRI initialization, pMGADRIServer->textureSize is determined
by using pMga->FbMapSize.
Is this correct?
Shouldn't it be pMga->FbUsableSize instead, since at least the HW cursor is
located at the end of videoram... or
How about a directory / database of cards and the motherboards /
Chipsets that are known to work, preferably with some info on how
they were gotten to work eg distro & patches applied.
IMHO the biggest problem people seem to have is incompatibilities
between chipset and graphics card, and if y
"Sottek, Matthew J" wrote:
>
> This patch adds in shared IRQ's. I added it in a manner that
> goes along with the template code so it should only alter
> the i810 driver.
>
> Plus, the i810 drm isn't working in XFree 4.1.0. I get
> regular oopsen when shutting down X leaving me with a blank
>
Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
> If it can't be done in the templates, the templates should be fixed...
>
> However, in the 3.5 branch I've just removed the interrupt altogether.
Good to hear :-)
-- Gareth
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:
Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
> Catonga wrote:
> >
> > The Voodoo 3 card is now nearly as fast as under Windows 2000
> > in Quake 3.
> >
> > I never imagined that this could get ever be possible.
> >
> > Thanks a lot to all that made this possible.
>
> Congratulations to Gareth...
Pity I was just get
Catonga wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I just read this great review of XFree 4.1.0
> on "the duke of url" Website:
>
> http://www.thedukeofurl.org/reviews/misc/xfree86410/index.shtml
>
> And what i saw was more than impressive!
>
> The Voodoo 3 card is now nearly as fast as under Windows 2000
> in Qu
"Sottek, Matthew J" wrote:
>
> The i810 driver used to have interrupt sharing before moving to the template
> code, it appears to have lost this functionality since the change. This is a
> real problem since a lot of the i810's and i815's have integrated lans that
> are using the same interrupt a
13 matches
Mail list logo
