Re: [Dri-devel] UT2k3 again

2003-09-14 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 07:15:50PM -0400, Daniel Vogel wrote: > I'm curious as well - does, Unreal Tournament 2003 work with DRI drivers? If > not, why not :) Well I have ut2k3 demo running on my Matrox G450 but it hits software fallbacks constantly. One problem is with texture_env_combine stuff

RE: [Dri-devel] UT2k3 again

2003-09-14 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
I occaisionally play ut2003 under FreeBSD with the r200 driver. Not as fast as the firegl drivers under Linux, but certainly playable. I can't comment on the current status of the driver in the DRI cvs (it'd be unfortunate if something broke), though I might give it a shot just to see now. Adam

RE: [Dri-devel] UT2k3 again

2003-09-14 Thread Daniel Vogel
I'm curious as well - does, Unreal Tournament 2003 work with DRI drivers? If not, why not :) On a related note, Unreal Tournament 2004 is going to support ARB_vertex_buffer_object and now would be a good time to voice concerns about the current rendering pipeline/ usage patterns. -- Daniel, Epic

Re: [Dri-users] Re: [Dri-devel] [ANNOUNCE] DRI Wiki (2 replace the devel FAQ and other docs)

2003-09-14 Thread Keith Whitwell
José Fonseca wrote: On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 02:47:16PM -0700, Jon Smirl wrote: I thought we were moving to http://dri.freedesktop.org/, why not use the wiki there? I knew about the CVS but I didn't knew anything regarding moving the DRI website. At this stage we're just moving cvs. Other stuff

Re: [Dri-devel] [ANNOUNCE] DRI Wiki (2 replace the devel FAQ and other docs)

2003-09-14 Thread José Fonseca
On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 02:47:16PM -0700, Jon Smirl wrote: > I thought we were moving to http://dri.freedesktop.org/, why not use the wiki > there? I knew about the CVS but I didn't knew anything regarding moving the DRI website. Nevertheless, when I choosed the Wiki implementation, I evaluated u

Re: [Dri-devel] [ANNOUNCE] DRI Wiki (2 replace the devel FAQ and other docs)

2003-09-14 Thread Jon Smirl
I thought we were moving to http://dri.freedesktop.org/, why not use the wiki there? --- José Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > When I was compiling the FAQ somebody suggested to use a Wiki. As I > wasn't very familiar with the concept I've opted with something more > mainstream as Doc

Re: [Dri-devel] RMrgeFB:The patch vs DRICVS dosen't break things too bad, maby not at all.

2003-09-14 Thread Alex Deucher
Are you sure have mergedfb set up correctly? 3D should work on both heads, not just one. check the man page for all the mergedfb options: http://www.botchco.com/alex/radeon/mergedfb/cvs/DRI/final/radeon.4.html Are you using pageflipping? If so, turn it off. it has some issues in certain modes

[Dri-devel] [Bug 314] 3D support for Radeon IGP chips

2003-09-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-14-09 17:09 --- I'm still surprised, why DR

[Dri-devel] [ANNOUNCE] DRI Wiki (2 replace the devel FAQ and other docs)

2003-09-14 Thread José Fonseca
Hi, When I was compiling the FAQ somebody suggested to use a Wiki. As I wasn't very familiar with the concept I've opted with something more mainstream as DocBook (DB). DB has the advantages of multiple output formats, but after the initial hype the hassle of the edit-convert-check-commit is reall

[Dri-devel] Re: ATI Radeon 9200 SE

2003-09-14 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote: >Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 13:29:07 +0200 >From: "Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Mike A. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >Subject: Re: ATI Radeon 9200 SE > >On Sun,

[Dri-devel] Re: ATI Radeon 9200 SE

2003-09-14 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 13:22, Mike A. Harris wrote: > On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dnzer wrote: > > >> Might want to update docs to show they're aliases too, to avoid > >> confusion also. ;o) > > > >I'll gladly do so if you show me where it's documented. > > radeon manpage Doesn't m

[Dri-devel] [Bug 314] 3D support for Radeon IGP chips

2003-09-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Dri-devel] Re: ATI Radeon 9200 SE

2003-09-14 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote: >> >Anyway, you should have read my second followup before sending >> >out yours. :) >> >> I read/respond serially usually. > >Can't Pine do better? :P > >> Might want to update docs to show they're aliases too, to avoid >> confusion also.

[Dri-devel] Re: ATI Radeon 9200 SE

2003-09-14 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 13:05, Mike A. Harris wrote: > On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dnzer wrote: > > >Anyway, you should have read my second followup before sending > >out yours. :) > > I read/respond serially usually. Can't Pine do better? :P > Might want to update docs to show the

[Dri-devel] Re: ATI Radeon 9200 SE

2003-09-14 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote: >> I think when things like this are changed, it is important to >> both document it widely, and also provide a backward >> compatibility mechanism. Otherwise it confuses users, and can >> cause tech support problems. > >Well, this option

[Dri-devel] Re: ATI Radeon 9200 SE

2003-09-14 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 12:54, Mike A. Harris wrote: > On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dnzer wrote: > > I think when things like this are changed, it is important to > both document it widely, and also provide a backward > compatibility mechanism. Otherwise it confuses users, and can >

[Dri-devel] Re: ATI Radeon 9200 SE

2003-09-14 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote: >> >> Option "AGPSize" "128" >> > >> >BTW, I renamed this to "GARTSize" in current DRI CVS. >> >> Is AGPsize an alias? > >No, I'm not aware of an alias mechanism for options. > >> Or when people upgrade in the future will their con

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: ATI Radeon 9200 SE

2003-09-14 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 12:27, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 10:24, Mike A. Harris wrote: > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dnzer wrote: > > > > >> Option "AGPSize" "128" > > > > > >BTW, I renamed this to "GARTSize" in current DRI CVS. > > > > Is AGPsize an alias?

[Dri-devel] Re: ATI Radeon 9200 SE

2003-09-14 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 10:24, Mike A. Harris wrote: > On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dnzer wrote: > > >> Option "AGPSize" "128" > > > >BTW, I renamed this to "GARTSize" in current DRI CVS. > > Is AGPsize an alias? No, I'm not aware of an alias mechanism for options. > Or whe

[Dri-devel] Your Bugzilla buglist needs attention.

2003-09-14 Thread bugadmin
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.] You have one or more bugs assigned to you in the Bugzilla bugsystem (http://bugs.xfree86.org/) that require attention

[Dri-devel] RMrgeFB:The patch vs DRICVS dosen't break things too bad, maby not at all.

2003-09-14 Thread Mike Mestnik
I just updated CVS and patched in http://www.botchco.com/alex/radeon/mergedfb/cvs/DRI/final/mergedfb-dri.diff Most everything that warked b4 still workes, there is a small problem with quake3. Small meaning not ought of the ordinary for DRICVS, things like textures on the floor appere to be behi

[Dri-devel] Re: ATI Radeon 9200 SE

2003-09-14 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote: >> My Device section looks like: >> >> Section "Device" >> Identifier "Radeon" >> Driver "radeon" >> BusID "PCI:1:0:0" >> Option "AGPMode" "4" >> Option "AGPSize" "128" > >BTW, I renamed this to "GART