I doesn't know other people was working on opengl windowing systems,
maybe we can collaborate in the future.
I think is a good idea use the X server as a trampoline as you can
use all those accelerated drivers out there, i am sticking with
Jon's work on mesa standalone as i really want to replace
--- Michael Dreesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> window compositing is working.
>
> Only one gl context is used for the window system's drawing. Clients
> draw into the back buffer. When a client wants to draw to a window, the
> server checks to see if that window's back texture is already on
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] is also supposed to be working on an OpenGL based
windowing
> system. I don't know the status of his code.
Hi Guys-
My mike-d.org server is down, this is my work address. Here's the
status of my OpenGL window system:
client/server is working.
Right now communication is don
--- Otto Solares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can i interface with your changes?, currently i open the fbdev,
> mmap fb and mmio region, set desired fbdev mode, load r200 dso, pull hooks
> and
> everything is ok from there. The only thing i dislike with the current
> aproach
> is that we need
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 02:28:53PM -0800, Jon Smirl wrote:
> --- Otto Solares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jon, should i convert r200 in Mesa-newtree to use SET_VERSION and then
> > GET_UNIQUE or there is more work to be done to eliminate root privs, is
> > backwards compability an issue too?
>
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=819
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Another problem I have is determining the name of the driver DSO to load. I
would like to just take the driver name from the DRM driver, concat _dri.so to
it and load. This works for everything except the radeon driver.
There are several solutions:
1) mess with the build to make two DRM drivers,
--- Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was going to add exporting of FB/MMIO size/length as a separate but
> standard DRM ioctl. It's cleaner that way I think. I don't think we
> have any real limit on the number of ioctls, so let's not make it a
> device-specific thing if there isn't a n
--- Otto Solares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jon, should i convert r200 in Mesa-newtree to use SET_VERSION and then
> GET_UNIQUE or there is more work to be done to eliminate root privs, is
> backwards compability an issue too?
The copy in bk://mesa3d.bkbits.net/jonsmirl is already converted. But
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 13:47, Otto Solares wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:19:54PM -0800, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > --- Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 12:25, Otto Solares wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:09:58PM -0800, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > > > > I currentl
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 03:47:23PM -0600, Otto Solares wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:19:54PM -0800, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > --- Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 12:25, Otto Solares wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:09:58PM -0800, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 13:19, Jon Smirl wrote:
> --- Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 12:25, Otto Solares wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:09:58PM -0800, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > > > I currently have this info tacked onto the end of the statistics IOCTL
> > (in
> >
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:19:54PM -0800, Jon Smirl wrote:
> --- Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 12:25, Otto Solares wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:09:58PM -0800, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > > > I currently have this info tacked onto the end of the statistics IOCT
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:08:28PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 12:25, Otto Solares wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:09:58PM -0800, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > > I currently have this info tacked onto the end of the statistics IOCTL (in
> > > order to conserve IOCTL numbers) but
--- Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 12:25, Otto Solares wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:09:58PM -0800, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > > I currently have this info tacked onto the end of the statistics IOCTL
> (in
> > > order to conserve IOCTL numbers) but there should be
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 12:25, Otto Solares wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:09:58PM -0800, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > I currently have this info tacked onto the end of the statistics IOCTL (in
> > order to conserve IOCTL numbers) but there should be a better way to do it.
>
> while you are on it, can
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:09:58PM -0800, Jon Smirl wrote:
> I currently have this info tacked onto the end of the statistics IOCTL (in
> order to conserve IOCTL numbers) but there should be a better way to do it.
while you are on it, can you check why DRM_IOCTL_SET_UNIQUE ioctl does need root
pri
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=819
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-04-11 10:38 ---
Robin,
When you load
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 12:11, Ronny V. Vindenes wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 03:28, Michel DÃnzer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 11:43, Ronny V. Vindenes wrote:
> > >
> > > (EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP GetBuffer -1020
> > > (EE) RADEON(0): GetBuffer timed out, resetting engine...
> >
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 03:28, Michel DÃnzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 11:43, Ronny V. Vindenes wrote:
> >
> > (EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP GetBuffer -1020
> > (EE) RADEON(0): GetBuffer timed out, resetting engine...
> > (EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP reset -1020
> > (EE) RADEO
21 matches
Mail list logo
