On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 06:11, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Can someone give me a clue as to where RADEONWaitForIdleMMIO is defined?
> I can't find it via grep, maybe a macro is building it.
programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon_accelfuncs.c,
FUNC_NAME(RADEONWaitForIdle) .
--
Earthling Michel DÃn
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=836
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-11 10:11 ---
Alex Deucher: I can no
Just a random datum: with a patch that enables agpgart applied to my dual
Opteron system, I finally have DRI and AGP with my Matrox G400. However,
the system crashes hard (no BUG or oops info in the syslog) when I run
glxgears.
The system is a dual Opteron 240, Tyan K8W motherboard; distro is Red
Via this snippet either RadeonWaitForIdleMMIO or RadeonWaitForIdleCP gets
defined. How does this work with explicit references to RadeonWaitForIdleMMIO in
other files?
#if defined(ACCEL_MMIO) && defined(ACCEL_CP)
#error Cannot define both MMIO and CP acceleration!
#endif
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 18:15, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Via this snippet either RadeonWaitForIdleMMIO or RadeonWaitForIdleCP gets
> defined. How does this work with explicit references to RadeonWaitForIdleMMIO in
> other files?
>
> #if defined(ACCEL_MMIO) && defined(ACCEL_CP)
> #error Cannot define both M
This is set to 4, should it be 8 now?
#define RADEON_AGP_MAX_MODE 4
=
Jon Smirl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
-
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-11 12:38 ---
I do not know what the
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 18:32, Jon Smirl wrote:
> This is set to 4, should it be 8 now?
>
> #define RADEON_AGP_MAX_MODE 4
No, it means 'maximum AGP mode supported by the radeon driver', not
'maximum AGP mode available in the universe'. :)
http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/radeon-agp8x.d
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-11 12:58 ---
And its not only that
Didn't keith do some agp 8x work a while back?
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 18:32, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > This is set to 4, should it be 8 now?
> >
> > #define RADEON_AGP_MAX_MODE 4
>
> No, it means 'maximum AGP mode supported by the radeon driver'
radeon_driver.c is getting pretty large (7,500 lines, 240KB). Would it be ok to
break it up into thirds? Maybe a split like this:
mode setting/discovery
save/restore
everything else
I'm trying to see if I can split out the very X specific stuff from the more
general things. This might give me a c
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=836
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-11 14:28 ---
The AGP mode doesn't s
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 20:20, Jon Smirl wrote:
> radeon_driver.c is getting pretty large (7,500 lines, 240KB). Would it be ok to
> break it up into thirds? Maybe a split like this:
>
> mode setting/discovery
> save/restore
> everything else
>
> I'm trying to see if I can split out the very X speci
13 matches
Mail list logo
