[Dri-devel] [Bug 314] 3D support for Radeon IGP chips

2004-04-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-19 03:12 --- I have uploaded

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM pci ids

2004-04-19 Thread Ian Romanick
Dave Airlie wrote: Okay I've come up with a method for generating the pci ids stuff for the DRM for Linux and BSD, put a txt file in shared or the format [cardname] vendid devid namestring have two scripts in the scripts directory ones to create a linux drm_pciids.h file of the format #define

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM pci ids

2004-04-19 Thread Jon Smirl
These PCI changes duplicate things that are in framebuffer. Shouldn't we be having a giant argument about them? I would think that is worse that DRM is is duplicating something in FB. The two IOCTLs I needed for reset don't exist in either FB or DRM. Anyway I think these changes need to go in. The

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM pci ids

2004-04-19 Thread Ian Romanick
Jon Smirl wrote: These PCI changes duplicate things that are in framebuffer. Shouldn't we be having a giant argument about them? I would think that is worse that DRM is is Heh...you sure do like to start fights, don't you? :) duplicating something in FB. The two IOCTLs I needed for reset don't

Re: [Dri-devel] RE: radeon t_vertex conversion (was: R200 t_vertex conversion)

2004-04-19 Thread Andreas Stenglein
Am 2004.04.19 00:51:16 +0200 schrieb(en) Michel Dänzer: On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 00:29, Andreas Stenglein wrote: After setting tcl_mode to 0, glxgears and quake3 didnt work as expected. glxgears looks like http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/glxgears.png here; if I press the cursor keys, the

[Dri-devel] Weekly IRC meeting reminder

2004-04-19 Thread Ian Romanick
This is just a friendly reminder that the weekly dri-devel IRC meeting will be starting in the #dri-devel channel on irc.freenode.net at 2100 UTC (or 4:00PM EST or 1:00PM PST, if you prefer). Time zone conversion available at: http://www.timezoneconverter.com/cgi-bin/tzc.tzc Logs of previous

Re: [Dri-devel] [PATCH] R200 t_vertex conversion

2004-04-19 Thread Ian Romanick
Keith Whitwell wrote: Ian Romanick wrote: This is what I have done so far to convert the R200 driver to use t_vertex. It is only a conversion for SW TCL, and it's not quite complete. I've managed to clean up all the crashes that I could find, but I've only tested with gears, geartrain, and

Re: [Dri-devel] Weekly IRC meeting reminder

2004-04-19 Thread Ian Romanick
Ian Romanick wrote: This is just a friendly reminder that the weekly dri-devel IRC meeting will be starting in the #dri-devel channel on irc.freenode.net at 2100 UTC (or 4:00PM EST or 1:00PM PST, if you prefer). Gak! My brain must be serious dysfunctional...5:00PM PDT or 2:00PM PDT. Time zone

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM pci ids

2004-04-19 Thread Alan Cox
On Llu, 2004-04-19 at 17:00, Jon Smirl wrote: These PCI changes duplicate things that are in framebuffer. Shouldn't we be having a giant argument about them? I would think that is worse that DRM is is duplicating something in FB. The two IOCTLs I needed for reset don't exist in either FB or

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM pci ids

2004-04-19 Thread Jon Smirl
--- Ian Romanick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you elaborate? I'm not super familiar with this part of the DRM, so I just need a clarification. We're just talking about device initialization (i.e., PCI mapping) that the X-server currently does, right? I'm not proprosing bringing any family

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM pci ids

2004-04-19 Thread Jon Smirl
--- Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For the 2D side I don't think its an ioctl problem as it is driven by the power management hooks. For 3D I can see it being relevant since you may want to reset the 3D engine from user space when the X server decides we have a failure, either by doing the

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM pci ids

2004-04-19 Thread Mike Mestnik
--- Ian Romanick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jon Smirl wrote: These PCI changes duplicate things that are in framebuffer. Shouldn't we be having a giant argument about them? I would think that is worse that DRM is is Heh...you sure do like to start fights, don't you? :) duplicating

Re: [Dri-devel] RE: radeon t_vertex conversion

2004-04-19 Thread Andreas Stenglein
Am 2004.04.19 20:09:29 +0200 schrieb(en) Keith Whitwell: Andreas Stenglein wrote: [...] it's almost the same here on x86: only the colors look a bit different. red corners, blue ring, black middle If you change the shape of the glxgears-window to widescreen you will see something

[Dri-devel] Mode setting

2004-04-19 Thread Jon Smirl
--- Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If they are needed then probably the basic video restore for fb modes belongs in the FB driver, and the 3D engine restore in the dri driver. That way users get the pieces they need. In time once we have a consistent video layer it will tidy up. Do you

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM pci ids

2004-04-19 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 18:00, Jon Smirl wrote: These PCI changes duplicate things that are in framebuffer. Shouldn't we be having a giant argument about them? I would think that is worse that DRM is is duplicating something in FB. The two IOCTLs I needed for reset don't exist in either FB or

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM pci ids

2004-04-19 Thread Dave Airlie
These PCI changes duplicate things that are in framebuffer. Shouldn't we be having a giant argument about them? I would think that is worse that DRM is is duplicating something in FB. The two IOCTLs I needed for reset don't exist in either FB or DRM. Anyway I think these changes need to go

[Dri-devel] [PATCH] Warning message cleanup

2004-04-19 Thread ajax
All drivers except savage emit the Direct rendering disabled message as an informational message; savage makes it an error. Technically it's not an error, since the server can continue, but it should probably be at least a warning. This would make troubleshooting easier, because users know to

Re: [Dri-devel] [PATCH] Warning message cleanup

2004-04-19 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 02:13, ajax wrote: All drivers except savage emit the Direct rendering disabled message as an informational message; savage makes it an error. Technically it's not an error, since the server can continue, but it should probably be at least a warning. This would make

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM pci ids

2004-04-19 Thread Jon Smirl
--- Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the Linux probe failed did I fallback to the manual scheme. A parallel method could be used on BSD. The only reason you need the manual scheme is if FB is already loaded and has the PCI ID registered. You want to use the kernel probe scheme

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM pci ids

2004-04-19 Thread Dave Airlie
already loaded and has the PCI ID registered. You want to use the kernel probe scheme first. If the kernel probe suceeds it will mark the hardware in use. The fallback scheme is a trick to use the hardware without informing the kernel. yes but it is also the current behaviour

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM pci ids

2004-04-19 Thread Jon Smirl
--- Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: simple behaviour is different, no idea if anyone relies on it .. modprobe radeon modprobe radeonfb will not longer work the same with the new system, be it stupid/broken etc,, there is potential difference in a stable kernel series, what happens

[Dri-devel] radeon: transient white lines

2004-04-19 Thread Tom Vier
i finally got dri working, but... i'm using 2.6.5 on x86 (dual opteron mobo with a single cpu). i have an agp 9200 and i'm using xfree 4.3.0. whenever i scroll or sometimes when inputing text, i get these white horizontal lines that appear in random spots for a split second. this happens in the