>
> That's ugly, and probably unnecessary. I'll take a look.
>
they should be all gone .. I fixed and actually tested for once the other
night..
Dave.
> - ajax
>
>
> ---
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: GNOME Foundation
> Hackers Unite! GU
gamma_dma_priority and gamma_dma_send_buffers both deref d->send_indices
and/or d->send_sizes. When these functions are called from gamma_dma,
these pointers are user pointers and are thus not safe to deref. This patch
copies over the pointers inside gamma_dma_priority and
gamma_dma_send_buffer
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 06:41:26PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 June 2004 15:27, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > Does anyone know how to get rid of the 500 warnings from the Mach64 driver?
> > None of the other drivers have this problem.
>
> ((GLubyte *)dst)++;
>
> That's ugly, and probably
My company is looking for a software engineer who is experienced in
developing a loadable DDX driver and/or DRI layer for XFree86.
We develop our own high end graphics boards and are going to be
developing a new board using one of the highest performance graphics
chips on the market (name withhel
On Tuesday 08 June 2004 18:58, Brian Paul wrote:
> John, I'm cc'ing the DRI and Mesa lists to see if anyone else has can
> try to reproduce this and perhaps diagnose it.
>
> It's probably a glitch in one of the texture formats that supported by
> the r200. I can give debugging tips to anyone who w
On Wednesday 02 June 2004 15:27, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Does anyone know how to get rid of the 500 warnings from the Mach64 driver?
> None of the other drivers have this problem.
((GLubyte *)dst)++;
That's ugly, and probably unnecessary. I'll take a look.
- ajax
--
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=733
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-09 19:29 ---
(In reply to comment #
