Is the i830 driver considered to be dead, should any future work go
towards the i915 one?
just like to get a semi-official idea? if so we need to import the up to
date DDX into the DRI tree and start releasing the snapshots for the i915
driver..
I'm bringing over some fixes for the i915 from the
OpenGL applications do not draw or draw strangely when using SiS DRI
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
In-Reply-To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please do not reply to this email: if you
want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your
comments there.
http://freedesktop.or
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 08:22:42AM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
> Is the i830 driver considered to be dead, should any future work go
> towards the i915 one?
I think you can deem the i830 driver dead, and the i915 superceeds it.
All future work should go to the i915 driver.
Alan.
OpenGL applications do not draw or draw strangely when using SiS DRI
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
In-Reply-To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please do not reply to this email: if you
want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your
comments there.
http://freedesktop.or
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 08:22:42 +0100 (IST), Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is the i830 driver considered to be dead, should any future work go
> towards the i915 one?
>
> just like to get a semi-official idea? if so we need to import the up to
> date DDX into the DRI tree and start rele
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 06:06, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 08:22:42 +0100 (IST), Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Is the i830 driver considered to be dead, should any future work go
> > towards the i915 one?
> >
> > just like to get a semi-official idea? if so we need to
Is it worth continuing to support a separate DDX tree for the DRI? In
my opinion, it would be easier for the DRI to just use XORG for DDX.
Any thoughts/opinions one way or another? I know idr may have some
issues with a different tree.
Alex
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Alex Deucher wrote:
>Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:06:26 -0400
>From: Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: i830 driver status..
>
>On T
Alex Deucher wrote:
Is it worth continuing to support a separate DDX tree for the DRI? In
my opinion, it would be easier for the DRI to just use XORG for DDX.
Any thoughts/opinions one way or another? I know idr may have some
issues with a different tree.
That shouldn't be a problem. I can't ev
Am Sonntag, 11. Juli 2004 21:10 schrieb Ian Romanick:
> These two patches cooperate to enable TLS support. For now you much
> manually add "#define GlxUseThreadLocalStorage YES" to your host.def to
> enable TLS support. Apply the Mesa patch to the Mesa tree and the DRI
> patch to the DRI tree.
>
10 matches
Mail list logo