OK, so current DRI sources have been merged. Sorry for the CVS logs not
being clear on the mailing list, but what happened was that after I
noticed that the Mesa log was huge I went and turned off logging until
after the conflict resolution. Probably should have turned it back on
before conflict
On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 03:21, Eric Anholt wrote:
OK, so current DRI sources have been merged. Sorry for the CVS logs not
being clear on the mailing list, but what happened was that after I
noticed that the Mesa log was huge I went and turned off logging until
after the conflict resolution.
On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 00:47, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 03:21, Eric Anholt wrote:
OK, so current DRI sources have been merged. Sorry for the CVS logs not
being clear on the mailing list, but what happened was that after I
noticed that the Mesa log was huge I went and
Adam Jackson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've got DRI and GLX working with the libdl module loader under current Xorg
CVS. It works well enough to run glxgears (both direct and indirect) and
quake3. The patch isn't quite finished, for two reasons. One, and rather
again please, found another error in the logic, this is like programming
by numbers!!! thanks be to God you found these issues before I submitted
this for the kernel :-)
Still the same. This is the debug msg:
[drm] Debug messages ON
[drm:drm_probe]
[drm:i830_stub_register]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 22 July 2004 04:09, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Can't this be expressed with the native library dependency mechanisms of
the OS? For instance, when you do 'ldd somelibrary', you get a list of
other libraries it depends upon. Why can't we
Since the packages from Micahel Dänzer are outdated and don't
contain the S3TC patch we now have the strange situation that the
lates non-free ATI drivers are easier to use on Debian GNU/Linux
than the lates DRI drivers.
Would it be possible to cretae a system for unsing the DRI drivers
similar to
Hi
I am happy to see that dri and drm are in xorg cvs (very cool:).
I will test savage dri soon.
But my email is about other subject.
So I think it time to have a new dri tree since the trunk tree is a
very old version.
Other question is about if we have updated dri and drm what about Mesa
is the
On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 18:11, Sérgio Monteiro Basto wrote:
Hi
I am happy to see that dri and drm are in xorg cvs (very cool:).
I will test savage dri soon.
But my email is about other subject.
So I think it time to have a new dri tree since the trunk tree is a
very old version.
Other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 23 July 2004 00:04, Eric Anholt wrote:
The point is that the DRI is merging into X.Org and there won't be a
separate tree any more. I still need to merge the development drivers
(mach64, savage), but my testbox is down due to a bad
10 matches
Mail list logo
